From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60297)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hhEWJ-0006Oe-MM
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:40:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hhEWI-0005SL-N8
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:40:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59494)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1hhEWI-0005SC-In
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:40:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hhEWI-000185-Dm
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:40:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#36411] [PATCH] gnu: Add libresprite.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.36411.B.15618191844312@debbugs.gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60183)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <cwebber@dustycloud.org>) id 1hhEVx-0006LZ-DD
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:39:42 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <cwebber@dustycloud.org>) id 1hhEVv-0005Ab-A4
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:39:41 -0400
Received: from dustycloud.org ([2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:feae:cb51]:33132)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <cwebber@dustycloud.org>)
 id 1hhEVr-00055K-Nc
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:39:37 -0400
References: <87y31m7d62.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org>
 <30d2762e-8cea-fa2d-24df-68a019fcea90@riseup.net>
 <8736jthkkd.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org>
 <cd1bd239-0135-bcd1-c103-736e86f87504@riseup.net>
 <87mui1flpv.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org>
From: Christopher Lemmer Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
In-reply-to: <87mui1flpv.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:39:30 -0400
Message-ID: <87mui0lal9.fsf@dustycloud.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: 36411@debbugs.gnu.org

Jakob L. Kreuze writes:

> swedebugia <swedebugia@riseup.net> writes:
>
>>> The bundled libraries is an issue with 'aseprite' as well. I'll see
>>> about submitting a separate patch to resolve it there.
>>
>> +1
>
> Though, after looking at it, I'm realizing that this involves about
> three new packages, as well as some minor patches upstream. I think I'll
> still work towards unbundling libraries, but it will take some time.

I don't think this needs to be a blocker on merging libresprite if it
wasn't a blocker on merging aesprite.  How about filing a separate bug
for that so we don't forget, then we can just worry about getting this
one in?

I wonder also if there are any significant benefits to keeping aesprite
around if we have libresprite.  What do you think?  Maybe aesprite could
become an alias for the new libresprite.  Thoughts?