From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47061)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hpbM3-0000Pg-Ip
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 12:40:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hpbM2-0005do-NL
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 12:40:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52950)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1hpbM2-0005dg-K9
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 12:40:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hpbM2-0003KH-Cz
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 12:40:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#36555] [PATCH v3 0/3] Refactor out common behavior for system
 reconfiguration.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.36555.B36555.156381354512710@debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <87imsci9sj.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org>
 <87ef30i9fl.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87y3129qsn.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87sgr9bziq.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87pnmc7nt1.fsf@gnu.org>
 <8736j7nwcb.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87muhfjm14.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87ftn63l7d.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87v9w1zgon.fsf_-_@sdf.lonestar.org>
 <87y30v3qke.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87a7d924wb.fsf@dustycloud.org>
 <87k1caavpu.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org>
From: Christopher Lemmer Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
In-reply-to: <87k1caavpu.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 12:39:01 -0400
Message-ID: <87muh6yqfu.fsf@dustycloud.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: "Jakob L. Kreuze" <zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org>
Cc: 36555@debbugs.gnu.org

Jakob L. Kreuze writes:

> Hey, Chris!
>
> Christopher Lemmer Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org> writes:
>
>> My main worry is that such a patch series may be forgotten. Would it
>> be inappropriate to make a "stub" patch issue for both of the followup
>> patch series, since both seem important and we don't want to forget
>> them?
>
> Alternatively, because these patches address existing issues with 'guix
> deploy', should we open tickets on the issue tracker? I don't have too
> much of a preference: either way should work fine for ensuring that we
> don't forget about them.
>
> Regards,
> Jakob

That's a good call.  Yeah, I think put them there.