From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33217) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iuNVi-0006CR-Pw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 16:26:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iuNVh-000684-Rp for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 16:26:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45483) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iuNVh-00067u-NW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 16:26:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iuNVh-0002Da-Jr for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 16:26:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#39146] [PATCH v2] gnu: icecat: Remove compiler paths from about:buildconfig Resent-Message-ID: From: Mark H Weaver In-Reply-To: <20200121185202.4cfbdc37@scratchpost.org> References: <20200115222115.322ymuuqkwlnbl3v@zdrowyportier.kadziolka.net> <20200121173711.5gegrl233dtjneni@zdrowyportier.kadziolka.net> <20200121185202.4cfbdc37@scratchpost.org> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 16:23:31 -0500 Message-ID: <87muaf6v81.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: Jakub =?UTF-8?Q?K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka?= , Marius Bakke , 39146@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Danny, Thanks for checking in with me on this. > since we have to touch Rust anyway, the icecat patch from Jakub below could also > go to guix staging. > > Is the patch OK? Should we do it? Instead of removing the build configuration information entirely, how about transforming the store paths in some way that makes them invisible to the reference scanner without losing information? For example, inserting a period (.) somewhere within the store hash would be sufficient and fairly obvious. What do you think? Also, the new phase should end with #t. Thanks, Mark