From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id uAElCOqYYF/GNgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:35:22 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id iJBxAuqYYF9LJwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:35:22 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 649E69402CC for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52722 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kI8Iy-00036n-9o for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 06:35:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50344) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kI8Ig-00034v-BN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 06:35:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45785) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kI8Ig-0003C3-08 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 06:35:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kI8If-0005Nd-TT for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 06:35:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#43160] [PATCH v3 1/2] gnu: linux-libre: Compare generated sources against Linux-libre releases. Resent-From: Mark H Weaver Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43160 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: 43160@debbugs.gnu.org, leo@famulari.name Received: via spool by 43160-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43160.160016607220637 (code B ref 43160); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:35:01 +0000 Received: (at 43160) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Sep 2020 10:34:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57329 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kI8IB-0005Mn-Oc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 06:34:31 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:39536) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kI8I8-0005MY-VD for 43160@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 06:34:30 -0400 Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kI8I3-0000Py-AE; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 06:34:23 -0400 From: Mark H Weaver In-Reply-To: <87sgbl5j94.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a6y1cg3i.fsf@netris.org> <20200911144459.27220-1-maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> <87tuw2exex.fsf@netris.org> <87sgbl5j94.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 06:33:07 -0400 Message-ID: <87mu1rba81.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: nUMUXutTNwO7 Hi Maxim, Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Mark H Weaver writes: > >> I've grown tired of arguing about this. You have the authority, so do >> as you will, and I will take my leave from maintenance of the kernel >> packages. Thanks for asking my opinion, anyway. >> >> Mark > > I was hoping this latest modified patch would meet both our goals > (strictly verified for the usual case, with an option to switch to > manual verification of the kernel sources for the exceptional security > quick releases). > > Sorry to have worn you out on this. I'll leave 2 weeks for the issue to > settle, hoping you might reconsider. I appreciate that. I'll attempt another followup in the next few days. Mark