From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 6HbcKOxShV+xSQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 07:10:36 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id KP+kJOxShV/EHQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 07:10:36 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 076ED9403CA for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 07:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53918 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSESB-0008Kc-08 for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 03:10:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35634) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSERe-0008KV-Ti for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 03:10:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33430) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSERe-000222-Kc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 03:10:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kSERe-0000Pt-E5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 03:10:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#43972] [PATCH] gnu: emacs-mixed-pitch: Update to 1.1.0. Resent-From: Nicolas Goaziou Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 07:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43972 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Joseph LaFreniere Cc: 43972@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 43972-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43972.16025729461520 (code B ref 43972); Tue, 13 Oct 2020 07:10:02 +0000 Received: (at 43972) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Oct 2020 07:09:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44976 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kSEQk-0000OS-5p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 03:09:06 -0400 Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]:57247) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kSEQh-0000Nv-Pt for 43972@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 03:09:05 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 185.131.40.67 Received: from localhost (40-67.ipv4.commingeshautdebit.fr [185.131.40.67]) (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9EE31C0006; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 07:08:56 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou References: <87d01m8x1h.fsf@odyssey.lafreniere.xyz> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 09:08:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87d01m8x1h.fsf@odyssey.lafreniere.xyz> (Joseph LaFreniere's message of "Tue, 13 Oct 2020 01:22:50 -0500") Message-ID: <87mu0q61rs.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: NXn/VFyMByhr Hello, Joseph LaFreniere writes: > Patch file is attached. Thank you. > There have been a couple of bugfix commits > since the tagged 1.1.0, so I went ahead and just grabbed the current > latest master. AFAICT, there are 3 commits since 1.1.0 release. One is about updating copyright years, the other two are adding faces to a list. Is there a strong reason to use a non-tagged commit instead of a regular release? If you think so, could you explain it in a comment at the beginning of the package? Otherwise, LGTM. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou