From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id KBMlHVpewV+hewAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 20:15:22 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id kGXnGFpewV8reQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 20:15:22 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 151EE940503 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 20:15:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:38120 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kik9I-0005Cd-Tq for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 15:15:20 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34864) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kik91-0005C0-1g for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 15:15:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34759) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kik90-0000GC-PN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 15:15:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kik90-00035t-KD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 15:15:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#44077] gnu: poetry: Update to 1.1.4. Resent-From: Nicolas Goaziou Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 20:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44077 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Tanguy Le Carrour Cc: 44077@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 44077-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44077.160650809711854 (code B ref 44077); Fri, 27 Nov 2020 20:15:02 +0000 Received: (at 44077) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2020 20:14:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46301 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kik8v-000357-9C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 15:14:57 -0500 Received: from relay12.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.232]:41261) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kik8s-00034q-KE for 44077@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 15:14:55 -0500 Received: from localhost (40-67.ipv4.commingeshautdebit.fr [185.131.40.67]) (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay12.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89035200002; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 20:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou References: <20201126133621.bnjr7g5p3rjndr2n@melmoth> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 21:14:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20201126133621.bnjr7g5p3rjndr2n@melmoth> (Tanguy Le Carrour's message of "Thu, 26 Nov 2020 14:36:21 +0100") Message-ID: <87mtz2tv49.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.27 X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-TUID: JjF0o+dY+1Fr Hello, Tanguy Le Carrour writes: > Sorry to ask you this, but not knowing exactly how the code review works, > I just wanted to know if my patch hadn't fallen into oblivion. Well, it had, indeed=E2=80=A6 =3D/ I looked at it again, and it LGTM. However python-distlib has a lot of dependents, so it needs to be applied on core-updates branch. If there is no objection, I'll do that soon. Regards, --=20 Nicolas Goaziou