From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id WCyNKpj7KGcuKwEAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 16:51:36 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id WCyNKpj7KGcuKwEAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 17:51:36 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=q5VUDYpS; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1730739096; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=qmVeArvPe8cnBOn15nhayDJs9AtKIM/55udPDOUWlvg=; b=at1BFGRGp/vASWmk6lClnE8fpievT1skSZk9HrJZmiTe5YDKxsgdzC/LLSPzZDEytMuu1A aDJrMshseqzaQDD+OsXQymiT1atVKVPrm27cjVWQJPfhA4mpYIWdzh627b5Ce2Zjj7rhXj L5Sdve5dIBfza02xfDzzysirSei6pBSSTvd38Jt8tT/4cs9phOlWu2FbnmDXVT1YIWqgT6 5WFKvWMJ8/HsVKxcxFaTOxzf8OfYbvb85xUeD43s/CzlywFwIgXJhhHQhgGBCnuPJF1dow z8rhU68L96U4VzdgtBPpxoxU9hGF07QZY6vYTBJZDaGKNQEQzvTnuqlLqxu57Q== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1730739096; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Jk7feJmAFEOVZQ25/aJ8xCwjowdSLmk8MuzI+CsPeTBwnHjZsYisoPf1jeDtL1XZW+bSdg LMbIMhqKqoe4C0Xna0353uK80rsQwAoxuP6/3Sl7nPI0iaEVwJSjUOebuFg9zkjp/eIWNF 7ZcolT+Yl8D34X5tbrGNi+KITDFhsZTR/AzxvTp2WGETm1n77bFxFhaZ9GRdKJHjRjRTDs NzaUUu2mX2FK2YDmOQOk2hVOaFP7YlHscOFxP+8aZkLz3WD7kqX9HDeD8GHwW/yfm/Wf2t DgRKjfkW8o1z/GmgTMpx3eD2mf3E4CtGWG7Yk3eLcO12cV+rl5nnHzMNzED+HA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=q5VUDYpS; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49E7186699 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 17:51:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t80IF-0004MQ-7i; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 11:51:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t80IC-0004Ls-2b for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 11:51:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t80IB-0004Rn-QN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 11:51:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=qmVeArvPe8cnBOn15nhayDJs9AtKIM/55udPDOUWlvg=; b=q5VUDYpSU/TjGBk+r+EELY3lh56s2CTMruULMpeXXK3xMbs//qa5Ac8dp7/cN60olrfoCBo88YqWaiCuJIIltpF0dHZ1D6lWlj+ul3dB/pWjQFLqAArs8thR49gYJIewlaEUdjLc/gUOgG2WFGYW1KGzOJREzsbI1EzWQ0h5c3HLZfzNv2t+9rbqFOsh3uW3Y6sqVp3hIORZJ/rgBBopp5xrqVw01ZhxOOwUXmX2BElnYn13LfOh8y8uFmvjHLo2Q7gKOtTsZtEzaDAxAsSi1hvlFa4bnPtVOgw/A7I02jgnrRDvKujlrtHAH1MFuGnoD1vS3UhBkUNuycuHiXNIFw==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t80IA-0001Kk-NQ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 11:51:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73288] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Resent-From: Z572 Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 16:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73288 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: john.kehayias@protonmail.com, dev@jpoiret.xyz, efraim@flashner.co.il X-Debbugs-Original-To: John Kehayias via Guix-patches via X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: John Kehayias , Josselin Poiret , Efraim Flashner , 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 73288-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73288.17307390445094 (code B ref 73288); Mon, 04 Nov 2024 16:51:02 +0000 Received: (at 73288) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2024 16:50:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41050 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t80Hs-0001K6-Az for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 11:50:44 -0500 Received: from smtp84.cstnet.cn ([159.226.251.84]:60960 helo=cstnet.cn) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t80Hp-0001Jy-Ln for 73288@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 11:50:43 -0500 Received: from m (unknown [107.174.64.25]) by APP-05 (Coremail) with SMTP id zQCowAAXKm5R+yhnNIyxDQ--.49060S2; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:50:30 +0800 (CST) From: Z572 In-Reply-To: <87zfmfafv6.fsf@protonmail.com> (John Kehayias via Guix-patches via's message of "Mon, 04 Nov 2024 02:32:31 +0000") References: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> <87cyjck50n.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> <87zfmfafv6.fsf@protonmail.com> Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:50:20 +0800 Message-ID: <87msifosdv.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-CM-TRANSID: zQCowAAXKm5R+yhnNIyxDQ--.49060S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxJw1fXF43Kr4rJrWfCr47XFb_yoW5uw1UpF Z8JFy3Kw4Dt34SyF1Iv348XFnYyw13JasxXryYgryjq34qvFnaq39a9r4S9rZ7Ar43CF42 qr4Utr9rCr90v37anT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUU9Cb7Iv0xC_Kw4lb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r1j6r4UM7CY07I2 0VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rw A2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4l84ACjcxK6xII jxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwA2z4x0Y4vEx4 A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Gr1UM2vj62AExVA0xI801c8C04v26x02cVCv0xWle2I262IY c4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wASzI0EjI02j7AqF2xKxwAqx4xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2 WlYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkE bVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvEwIxGrwCY1x0262kKe7AKxVWUAVWUtwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrw CFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE 14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_JF0_Jw1lIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2 IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxK x2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI 0_Gr0_Gr1UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07jRAp5UUUUU= X-Originating-IP: [107.174.64.25] X-CM-SenderInfo: x2kh0wxmxqyx3h6l2u1dvotugofq/ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.66 X-Spam-Score: -6.66 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 49E7186699 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-TUID: ghrXiYDFGTUY --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain John Kehayias via Guix-patches via writes: > Hi all, > > On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 03:02 PM, Efraim Flashner wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 06:04:08PM +0800, Z572 wrote: >>> John Kehayias via Guix-patches via writes: >>> >>> > Hello Guix, >>> > >>> > The mesa-updates branch I think is just almost ready for >>> > merging. Besides some other fixes and updates, the main series is >>> > tracked at . There is an update to >>> > add NVK support to mesa for x86_64-linux which I need to review and >>> > push (and rebase to get more fixes from master). >>> > >>> > Coverage looks good for x86_64 and i686 on QA, with powerpc64le as >>> > well on Berlin. I worry that aarch64 and others may have stalled out >>> > on Bordeaux. Perhaps Efraim can chime in there. >>> > >>> > With an update for NVK for x86_64, that will take maybe a day to catch >>> > up again in builds but tends to be pretty quick. I'm not aware of >>> > other blockers. >>> > >>> > Thanks! >>> > John >>> >>> maybe is time to merge? >>> >>> see >>> ci have x86_64-linux 96.3%, i686-linux 87.7%, powerpc64le-linux 85.5% >>> bordeaux have x86_64-linux 91.5%, i686-linux 77.8%, armhf-linux >>> 79.4%, aarch64-linux 89.0%. >>> >>> Is there anything else in the way? >> >> Comparing them against master and against each other: >> x86_64: comparable on ci, slight regression on bordeaux >> i686: comparable on ci, regression on bordeaux (91.8 -> 77.8) >> aarch64: comparable on ci, regression on bordeaux (97.0 -> 89.0) >> armhf: slight regression on bordeaux >> ppc64le: comparable on ci and bordeaux >> riscv64: regression on bordeaux (62.0 -> 28.2) >> >> I feel like bordeaux will catch-up fairly quickly post merge. However, >> we do now have the regression page for bordeaux of master vs >> mesa-updates: >> >> >> However, after spot-checking a few of them to see if there are >> substitutes (including gnome and openjdk) it looks like it probably just >> needs to be sent through again. >> >> It looks okay to me > > I had been keeping a close eye some weeks ago during the initial batch > of patches I pushed and I also think everything looks good. I was just > waiting for non-x86 substitute coverage which seems to finally be > there as noted above after waiting for other branches and recent > Berlin issues. I have been running my system on this branch for a > couple weeks as well. > > However, the other day on IRC there was a comment about (if I > remember) Sway hardware acceleration needing newer libva...? I think > it was Josselin (cc'ed); apologies if I misremembered as I was > traveling. > > Is that a blocker? If so, it would be good to have that update (plus > likely yet another mesa version bump) so substitutes can be > rebuilt. But I also don't want to hold up any other branches longer > than necessary as this has already been waiting for some weeks. i think we can merge this branch first, and setup a new branch to fix/update libva and mesa, people can use inferior to get have hardware acceleration package on new branch. WDYT? > > John --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfr6klGDOXiwIdX/bO1qpk+Gi3/AFAmco+0wACgkQO1qpk+Gi 3/CTVBAAifnetm5PBi1i9Zk601OehjQHyoRzHlCYQ0tL1rB1XCw9fwljVp9tMH/N ATY/+eoRzSc1Mg04Wwna41Us9t1+xh9nODkaaC9ge4+rCSiEVV6Q0Zs71OG2sUrI 0wfbsDp9Uufxq4L00JdWBV33QSvM9zo+JV6sLtadohSvOtPOt1Om97v5WAxuNPGr /Ls3NAKuubz8IXES1426T5u0X8w/H4GV4qfDupujMH86PntgxEP8im+sFu6nbvHN gVJQUS4KZ24znfGiaeyHf3ni1CBMyIMm70QvbQtSZRXiiQc1IAD4fopJBDR5o6u/ SPC1xTsKRYnfbW9q3uNqSpQqU/5/eoR6jyf4/aNRBYC4oB/Mci6beMrbfk/cE8gN /ynPemup7Nq28zVQsvPiCv8JTncepIGdtFi5uqc/F7Ra8Q772mBwmnjy46/+Mp/z b73utbd4ePRoWh0TE8ZBZlNJim1z3jC+/hic5r0f7lZLJOLw/HVwEfbli1vLBT5F 85XbVOcrSiOAW3xzKl2xg7+J04vqLcPjBBHNhtb9sn14sYisVLKyNxKPs/3cwHkC Mex/33mwPMvaO3dw99rUH0Hq6J9UlY02X2dZV2kzbHg7Vzu2QCYHuPDCFULVZ7Fk o+58RA0Ixm1LLM4osjMaw8Wm0COupJxOe6BHQovPPeJvafLR6Pk= =8XrE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--