From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58167) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d714z-0000qE-0n for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 10:53:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d714v-0002vd-UF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 10:53:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59998) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d714v-0002vQ-Qe for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 10:53:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d714v-0001GE-K3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 10:53:01 -0400 Subject: bug#26713: [PATCH] gnu: Move netsurf to web-browsers.scm. Resent-Message-ID: From: Kei Kebreau References: <20170429220942.26880-1-kei@openmailbox.org> <20170430191306.GA26169@jasmine> <87shkpoehf.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87o9vdo805.fsf@openmailbox.org> Date: Sat, 06 May 2017 10:51:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87o9vdo805.fsf@openmailbox.org> (Kei Kebreau's message of "Sun, 30 Apr 2017 18:17:30 -0400") Message-ID: <87lgqaghsh.fsf@openmailbox.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 26713@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Kei Kebreau writes: > Kei Kebreau writes: > >> Leo Famulari writes: >> >>> On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 06:09:42PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote: >>>> * gnu/packages/web.scm: Move netsurf... >>>> * gnu/packages/web-browsers.scm: ...here. >>> >>> This caused building Guix to fail because the glib-or-gtk build-system >>> module was not imported in (gnu packages web-browsers). >>> >> >> Oh no! :( >> >>> I planned to add that module in a followup commit, but I realized that >>> several other variables from (gnu packages web) need to be imported in >>> (gnu packages web-browsers) along with this change, and I decided to >>> revert the change for now. >>> >>> Can you take another look at moving this package? >> >> Will do. I'll have to adjust the qutebrowser patch for corrections to >> this one. > > Try the attached patch. I'm not sure that copying the definition of > netsurf-buildsystem is the best way to handle the move, but I'm not sure > this is worth making netsurf-buildsystem a publicly-defined package. > > Thoughts? If you have no objections, I'd like to push this. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEg7ZwOtzKO2lLzi2m5qXuPBlGeg0FAlkN4u4ACgkQ5qXuPBlG eg3dPg//VW7p48qBqUkuOVpuJtto8gbaZWeVqf8/cYAesPwdKEhNW0Cse6X3TsAi 6wXbObQ56eVdBcKcQaQbDwfZBZabaLNin0WJwJYWwBc0in8w0zcOfdXouS2ChCcA URaXJXQQeWzcFoY54DLaXfgPruDxmQm3eYTnDeArRjO/HfV483jkxIv/MJDJfr31 abQoI3MpQh/gG5Ze6yPjvHUJHdjl3ld8ejtuukSal6dDk6BhuBV9+6+Qz/+nI28a uc1MOJXuPUf9kuvi+l1Lqdp26sjbexrv4uSPHI3bA4CCicXqoEyB1/Gswecpz+gn vFG+LeoTVT/BNM8DydJRrXyuxK9O9VQu4bUJSjhNOaf/UJfHOJ/RNp04kPeg9o2R cckedtVS32YaIeo2MMT7zwkhqzzIVL5td96RQur7QmsTt5drcfkUEW6SMcmAjq9k S+mnHU4yXia9b99bGjf/Q0OuyaS6aKbS0yIItIHKhiScpbAsQOaCaVeAH0MCjGdH I2oUzvoIqDkoS3TPa9mr2XWBx+K05sb5fFujZhU0tCAwqwzH7jYjKqoE7/qeZwmG jx85KFQV6YvoLfq+ZuvY7ZSzt895llNJf969OgWvRMlQ16JzWHjpQYGxkeZGDn7s nQybNSG4+fuLp/U2J9BruZrlLKNGKrR+VajbCde+OqMIKakN0GQ= =r1n/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--