From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36351) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dcTUA-0004nS-DN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 05:29:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dcTU6-0005go-Aa for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 05:29:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33437) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dcTU6-0005ge-6h for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 05:29:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dcTU5-0006Rz-Pi for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 05:29:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#27850] gnu: mpi: openmpi: Don't enable thread-multiple Resent-Message-ID: From: ludovic.courtes@inria.fr (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <87wp6thqjc.fsf@i-ulialbion.it.manchester.ac.uk> <87379c4oxs.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9s0bhro.fsf@i-ulialbion.it.manchester.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 11:27:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87o9s0bhro.fsf@i-ulialbion.it.manchester.ac.uk> (Dave Love's message of "Mon, 31 Jul 2017 19:09:15 +0100") Message-ID: <87lgn3skmm.fsf@inria.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Dave Love Cc: 27850@debbugs.gnu.org Dave Love skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: [...] >>> (arguments >>> `(#:configure-flags `("--enable-static" >>>=20=20 >>> - "--enable-mpi-thread-multiple" >> >> Should we upgrade our openmpi package instead of doing this? > > I don't know whether they've fixed all the breakage I knew about in > OMPI 2 or whether there's still any penalty from thread-multiple. 1.10 > seems fairly safe, but I don't have strong opinions if people think 2 is > solid. Apart from ABI incompatibility, I assume it has the usual > incompatibilities at the mpirun/MCA level, and that they aren't well > documented. ABI compatibility is normally not an issue with Guix, so I=E2=80=99d be in = favor of upgrading to 2.0.3. Would you like to do it? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.