From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44488) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gLbnR-0001lI-6a for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:32:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gLbnQ-0006mq-Fo for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:32:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40892) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gLbnQ-0006mh-C9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:32:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gLbnN-0005ko-O0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:32:04 -0500 Subject: [bug#33329] [PATCH] gnu: Deprecate linux-module shpchp and tell user to remove it. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <87h8jbang2.fsf@elephly.net> <01fa8c80-c57c-f73a-cec1-af91cacb58bf@riseup.net> <290b28ec-cd1e-e5e8-275e-133771c7d4f3@riseup.net> Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 23:31:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <290b28ec-cd1e-e5e8-275e-133771c7d4f3@riseup.net> (swedebugia's message of "Sat, 10 Nov 2018 13:03:29 +0100") Message-ID: <87lg60va39.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: swedebugia Cc: rekado@elephly.net, 33329@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, swedebugia skribis: > From 4d70dda8c2f119fc6ff9d221eae6f060ff1fcd98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: swedebugia > Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 22:52:12 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] [V2] gnu: Check for linux-module shpchp and tell user to > remove it. > > * gnu/system/mapped-devices.scm (check-device-initrd-modules): New if > statement raising a condition if shpchp is found. I don=E2=80=99t think we should hard-code things like this: they would accumulate over the years and become unmanageable. If anything, what should be improved IMO is the error message you get when specifying a module that is unavailable. That=E2=80=99s not easily do= ne though since that happens at build time. Thoughts? Ludo=E2=80=99.