From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40905) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iwLhC-0007wc-P9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 02:54:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwLhB-0007Bn-QD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 02:54:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53449) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwLhB-0007Bc-NJ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 02:54:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iwLhB-00065V-LT for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 02:54:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#39321] [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-unkillable-scratch. Resent-Message-ID: From: Nicolas Goaziou References: <20200127235121.14924-1-mab@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 08:53:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20200127235121.14924-1-mab@gnu.org> (Amin Bandali's message of "Mon, 27 Jan 2020 18:51:21 -0500") Message-ID: <87lfpsm2zg.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Amin Bandali Cc: 39321@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, Amin Bandali writes: > * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-unkillable-scratch): New variable. Thank you. > +(define-public emacs-unkillable-scratch > + (let ((commit "b24c2a760529833f230c14cb02ff6e7ec92288ab") > + (revision "0")) > + (package > + (name "emacs-unkillable-scratch") > + (version (git-version "1.0.0" revision commit)) Is there any reason to use this particular commit? If so, please add a comment in the definition. Otherwise, I suggest to stick to stable releases. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou