From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id QAixM0thtF5WcQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 07 May 2020 19:28:11 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id eKafClhhtF4hWgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 07 May 2020 19:28:24 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142::17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E6D6940BFF for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 19:28:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40244 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWmBl-0002qF-4g for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 07 May 2020 15:28:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58376) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWmBe-0002om-OH for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 07 May 2020 15:28:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60704) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWmBe-00041n-FI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 07 May 2020 15:28:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jWmBe-00018c-B0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 07 May 2020 15:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#41036] ruby: Update to 2.7.3 Resent-From: Ryan Prior Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 19:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41036 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Pierre Neidhardt , Mikhail Kirillov , Jelle Licht , Brian Leung , "Collin J. Doering" , "Diego N. Barbato" Cc: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 41036@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 41036-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41036.15888796674347 (code B ref 41036); Thu, 07 May 2020 19:28:02 +0000 Received: (at 41036) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 May 2020 19:27:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44017 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jWmBP-000183-4k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 May 2020 15:27:47 -0400 Received: from mail-40131.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.131]:54708) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jWmBN-00017m-AI for 41036@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 May 2020 15:27:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 19:27:29 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1588879659; bh=3+fskFjMiUaCvOCxEuF6Cy3SiVcqzJK5sA5NK0yWHLM=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=yMkfxrvL3/s/WGZ6x8vkzNjzIM50sXc5Wq41xTDhX91M1l2ham+vorBMdlFo7+srv M+rc8GUewkj58aKhnNgZyySrkJyI2OnxoRHcGUYi1Zr43PWKschXXM75X09Inj+LPb 405RFBz+DCKzAcV4QU2LSE7dr8oov4DHmyssHnYw= Message-ID: <87lfm3bl6m.fsf@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87v9l8dw4e.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87v9l8dw4e.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" Reply-to: Ryan Prior , Ryan Prior via Guix-patches From: Ryan Prior via Guix-patches via X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: 1.49 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail header.b=yMkfxrvL; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 2001:470:142::17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [1.49 / 13.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[rprior@protonmail.com]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.49827626135667]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:470:142::/48:c]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.10), country: US(-0.00), ip: 2001:470:142::17(-0.50)]; DWL_DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:from]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[protonmail.com:s=protonmail]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[protonmail.com:-]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[8]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[ambrevar.xyz,gmail.com,fsfe.org,rekahsoft.ca,posteo.de]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:server fail]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:2001:470:142::/48, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[guix-patches@gnu.org,guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[gnu.org:email,2.0.0.5:email]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_REPLYTO(0.00)[protonmail.com,gnu.org]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gnu.org]; DBL_PROHIBIT(0.00)[2.0.0.5:email]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[7]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[] X-TUID: /rabT1LIZj5F Hi there! I'm Ryan Prior, a rubyist and Guix maintainer. I'm writing you because I'd like your feedback on my patches to add Ruby 2.7.3 to Guix and eventually to make that the default version of Ruby. I got your email address from the Ruby package in Guix master. You can find my version of the Ruby package here: https://github.com/ryanprior/guix-packages#ruby Discussion is in the Guix issue tracker here: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/41036 Thank you for contributing to Ruby and Guix, I appreciate your time! Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (cc'd) writes: > =E2=80=98guix refresh -l ruby@2.5=E2=80=99 says there are 4K packages dep= ending on it > (which I didn=E2=80=99t expect). So this change should probably go to th= e next > =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 according to our guidelines (info "(guix) = Submitting > Patches"). I think it's a high priority to get 2.7 into Guix so people can start testing it and building off of it, but fine to hold off making it the default until the next core-update cycle. > Did you have a chance to test the impact of this change on Ruby > packages? Perhaps you should ping other people who last upgraded > Ruby. I've tried a few core things like irb and bundler but have yet to undertake a more serious testing plan. Thank you for the suggestion Ludo! Warmly, Ryan Prior