From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id WOa7MiANvV84cQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 13:39:44 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id eAedLiANvV9kFQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 13:39:44 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9621A9401BC for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 13:39:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:57566 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khYXn-0005sx-IB for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:39:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55006) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khYUF-00035b-9l for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:36:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46712) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khYUF-0003G7-2f for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:36:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khYUF-0001pz-0W for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:36:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#44800] [PATCH 0/2] publish: Add Avahi support. Resent-From: Mathieu Othacehe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 13:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44800 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: zimoun Cc: 44800@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 44800-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44800.16062249296987 (code B ref 44800); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 13:36:02 +0000 Received: (at 44800) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2020 13:35:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58253 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khYTg-0001od-Uh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:35:29 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36596) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khYTf-0001oM-6Z for 44800@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:35:27 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43123) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khYTX-0002sU-W2; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:35:20 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:3c14:dca1:bc4:a96f] (port=50384 helo=cervin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1khYTT-0002L2-No; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:35:18 -0500 From: Mathieu Othacehe References: <20201122155659.67235-1-othacehe@gnu.org> <867dqbviey.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:35:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <867dqbviey.fsf@gmail.com> (zimoun's message of "Mon, 23 Nov 2020 23:04:53 +0100") Message-ID: <87lfeqnai5.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.51 X-TUID: 6msD+wQZAu6l Hey zimoun, > Is this part of your new design? Somehow because it allows the machines on a local network to share substitutes between each other transparently. It not strictly needed however because the offloading workers directly add the offloading server to their substitute list in the design I'm proposing. > What happen if the option is passed but the servers are not reliable > (the connection is unstable)? The build fails with the following message: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- guix substitute: error: connect: No route to host substitution of /gnu/store/pbaihd2k2dbv02s7aq3aybk29r00lg9h-abduco-0.6 failed guix build: error: some substitutes for the outputs of derivation `/gnu/store/xnfyilqfhk05rgxbq7hmx81d65bsnprh-abduco-0.6.drv' failed (usually happens due to networking issues); try `--fallback' to build derivation from source --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Thanks, Mathieu