From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 8PHwJ9bIK2J6DgAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 23:10:30 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id oIu0JNbIK2I9YQEAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 23:10:30 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54AAF1F84A for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 23:10:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40374 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nSnSu-00074Y-Tu for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 17:10:28 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54982) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nSnSV-000748-6H for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 17:10:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44674) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nSnSU-0002JE-Tf for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 17:10:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nSnSU-0004xE-Ie for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 17:10:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#54252] [PATCH] gnu: lemonbar: Update to 1.4. Resent-From: Nicolas Goaziou Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 22:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54252 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: 54252@debbugs.gnu.org, Maxime Devos , Jai Vetrivelan Received: via spool by 54252-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54252.164703655618968 (code B ref 54252); Fri, 11 Mar 2022 22:10:02 +0000 Received: (at 54252) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Mar 2022 22:09:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38567 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nSnRk-0004vk-K6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 17:09:16 -0500 Received: from relay12.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.232]:59761) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nSnRi-0004vV-PE for 54252@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 17:09:15 -0500 Received: (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 61B86200002; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 22:09:07 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou References: <87k0d953yg.fsf@gmail.com> <87bkyd48ny.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87y21g3n6r.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <8735joti6b.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 23:09:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8735joti6b.fsf@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Fri, 11 Mar 2022 14:15:08 -0500") Message-ID: <87lexg2lbx.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1647036630; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=IKyAfJEJ3uM/774iKcALoruO6Clw/v32Z9JPJR+GGdk=; b=fjAIm7GFc0vg8YBwNBHHU147IicWELpz32UhW3+bdxVUjzu9BAYXXqrFpIJL6HuCMFZxCs R3Ia7xbtV/FIlCGisi6PAinkFmg7XWi/9gUqCCKIGCJ3BW2WIUtCVdV5avcX67PJ647mN0 ZLoeJRl1LhWsxfpTslEWNQIG2BgdCQu0FUB2xxODVSKVq9D67RsUG/5ChQmMwuyIR6QaEu kCwnmY3Uttl2ODrD/nSHgLpn/7Y44F9w6cwbaNCaZ6LQc8gkAJle0GUIeul89x7cHx5iXW Lr6+zSCC497KFqeuCsweGcfbakTAVGqhFvJK2LXyZ4HyBg/ABHuCZD7OWxDCWw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1647036630; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=iVV5j3EvwttRJ5a2MtESRycXHWEq5+7rzBv9C9GRop8BiVWJ7oWOsvJgeFeP5bodtYdMe3 Gmnca/tD3pP9SzO7nx+8yKdk8QhuSx7FN28qW38k3ZBWyiELt7p9jwiN2imtYHVl3Pl/ro WIpInM/ekDqlwB0RwyqQzhnfNk3erF/tTtXLseXg/HUKymZuLg0y+C1UJ59N0jM4kCbGl+ hCYEW0MHBf3B+noOYguyPQRKGQkls1cIJB8QgdUN8MjXi5SqKnnostSxzK6pp7aDcRO9GS pN3CFuwHSRy4OE0M2QDYjKbclXXXIYFb8FOKc6AIxnMf4eEYUWhiajHIL7/jpQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.09 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 54AAF1F84A X-Spam-Score: -2.09 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: xadWj6MutD0E Hello, Maxim Cournoyer writes: > I don't have the full context, but I'll chip in in case it is useful. > When problems in the packaging are discovered as part of our activities, > I think it is part of our duty to at least report them and > cross-reference them via a comment in the package source if possible. As stated previously, it is very good if the packager also has sufficient knowledge to find and understand a bug in the source code they are packaging. This can help both Guix and upstream. However, in this thread the packager claimed they did not have sufficient knowledge in C to do so. I think it is not a reasonable expectation to ask them to report a problem they may not understand sufficiently in order to write a proper report and possibly take part to the discussion that would entail. Moreover, in this particular situation, Jai Vetrivelan is not the original packager for lemonbar; they are merely updating it. This is another reason for not pressuring them to realize a report that might put them in an uncomfortable position. I hope that makes sense. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou