unofficial mirror of guix-patches@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: Andrew Miloradovsky <andrew@interpretmath.pw>,
	34378-done@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#34378: update GNOME Planner to current
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 14:55:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lereg57x.fsf_-_@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k1h5v2i6.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic Courtès"'s message of "Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:45:21 +0100")

Hello,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

[...]

>>>> +  ;;; Warning:
>>>> +  ;;; The documentation generation mechanism is long broken. No Yelp yet.
>>>> +  ;;; So the output doesn't contain any docs, unlike the ancient release.
>>>> +  ;;; OTOH, that's probably not a huge concern, given the circumstances.
>>>> +  (let ((commit "fa7cbe309d5a705502ca46f808bcf78840804dbe")
>>>> +        (revision "2019-02-08"))
>>> How did you pick this particular commit?  In general we only package
>>> releases, unless there’s a compelling reason to build straight from the
>>> VCS.  Do you think that’s the case here?
>>
>> I picked that commit just because it was the most recent: the release is
>> expected to be very difficult to make, a lot of things need to be
>> fixed/modernized first, and there are not many people to review the
>> patches (one to be exact, AFAICT).
>>
>> I'm not sure there are really compelling reasons: most/all of the
>> changes made since the release are either about translations
>> (documentation generation is broken anyways), or fixes of deprecation
>> warnings (which otherwise would prevent it from building in Nixpkgs with
>> the default -Werror).
>
> OK.  I think it’s a case where we’d wait for upstream to push a new
> release, rather than guess which commit is appropriate to distribute.
>
> Thoughts?

Agreed.  Closing.

Maxim




      reply	other threads:[~2022-08-23 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-08  1:54 [bug#34378] update GNOME Planner to current Andrew Miloradovsky
2019-02-12 21:58 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-02-13 13:13   ` Andrew Miloradovsky
2019-03-11 15:45     ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-08-23 18:55       ` Maxim Cournoyer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87lereg57x.fsf_-_@gmail.com \
    --to=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com \
    --cc=34378-done@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=andrew@interpretmath.pw \
    --cc=ludo@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).