From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6DvdJu5lfGZK5gAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 19:03:10 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6DvdJu5lfGZK5gAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 21:03:10 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=RyS4+rFt; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1719428590; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=dmZggiJ0Em5wCHmeluvjlVL9iKKNjNrxajXJi9jAegQ=; b=Y5MNQpDBkyzO9WmbeIV6AXx8LunpTAC0LHVmxEFafDRXCS99bbnW3IaeHajwl9ylxSQ3G6 hylupyv8e4/B5pSUNAqDEsBHY3GD9ddRgQYZ9u86b2OZWFzGsEoJVOc5uEiEe6SqRI00pn t8yiXM2y+u1Ywwef1IO0Otg8Yn02UlUe8eOVn89JIAyfO4xuaZCpmiTyf2vG3Dxz7WJTec EXWrWBJe4qyInWSejX36Iu6GDLGVGM1/2MZF1vvL5D6t15+grAt48ajri0boMWMc4ac0tP 8j6mC61n+rt6BOeXX84IEaqQl5k71yxOoHpeB9KdnVFdxR/4q91has7nMIxi7w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=RyS4+rFt; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1719428590; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=gvKFCAo1Zb6JjVG+/MyRInFfeWwFLtw6COJSVumjD9nCaGxvsQQpqXsVlEiG4QJlp58ve9 q3I2Rm6KfON0+zp2HqP31ixzrDgIMdneTmGq64qJXDuFTJiRQWaKc6LpB6BsY34eyX5vp5 IKsz5netRVgmqYN5gP7EUbNUvJFvzctYfANT8ch3QolAPOomH3dpyYqJQ0CfrnvIA4rOBO SpvfIofVvt8ZGtb56XjR3Zy6QAZJE67yRRYQoN9cjxzjYS07Y7eoAxG8PADPzvCYIspF4+ m64LXsRWZlM10tTvBQyq+toDl0kVRjenv161qm3hMDZzqu85qISNg6S2SJngyw== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FE6E756C4 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 21:03:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sMXv3-0007Xy-DE; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:03:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sMXv1-0007XU-PZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:02:59 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sMXv1-0003nc-HR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:02:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sMXv3-0006Zp-NN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:03:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#71381] Why is this closed ? Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 19:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71381 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Leo Famulari Cc: 71381-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Ashish SHUKLA Received: via spool by 71381-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D71381.171942855025242 (code D ref 71381); Wed, 26 Jun 2024 19:03:01 +0000 Received: (at 71381-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2024 19:02:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40270 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sMXuY-0006Z3-2j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:02:30 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f44.google.com ([209.85.210.44]:61651) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sMXuV-0006Yr-Ul for 71381-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:02:28 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f44.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-701eea2095eso43509a34.2 for <71381-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 12:02:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1719428479; x=1720033279; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dmZggiJ0Em5wCHmeluvjlVL9iKKNjNrxajXJi9jAegQ=; b=RyS4+rFtDPU8MOprOKjDpzHYaSQU4U20sD67YtrNH9fl/5aohrcq6hjxzFJiq+vpSU ql6dTWrdZJdgo9igpsyeMG+B8oVxUv3tLdn9D6cyCjCg5sTyg8qgXTF2fmD4/pZ8uY/j N0R+mX6gRCT1jniOtMGEpqU5OUOU8L42DGF3ltQtZMkje6OcpyrkI2tHQAjyf7XSwU7t CoEtok3UQ4GbLQPZADPptoeATtAZjyDB2eRf9wShbS+G9gM/Tqryz6FIJC5mKvjI93G2 1dx8AirhGJhz0lRGoQRqo+Wf+YPu0kABCm9+POmBadHRDfpuPrtQN62K8Be6+EJatwrG dkAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1719428479; x=1720033279; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=dmZggiJ0Em5wCHmeluvjlVL9iKKNjNrxajXJi9jAegQ=; b=gMcQi3u0P02gFVdRfjwvA9ChHczZISd3m8YjzcwfQPnalusuyYkEkTAisWVgA6Uam+ G1XFULqNdG0oFXRF+wm5mdGp+g+Fg6Hg3gv5SkJoVNJxHgeoQ5DiL2ZWorYkXKMgtVh9 GVl3sJvCKReYzGCBNkRBhHMF+hhCb9k+kFxVrbpz9W7wN/3czrwik3vu7+N0ZwF5Cb9F B74h5ESoLlgPYkScWtG2T7u4k0SXVri5mIHryKDvMWNUuVejk0y+xyi+MhJEJ5AmT5AZ fB0imyqqvXNn7rkb4uHtW+XuPQDZ7VVQODiyehFTipfE8ypzBniM5W1TJDiw7rTAL29l XWBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzcSn2BZ4jDWY86l+MSkvb+EbeCGUSAQRkIOFOsqQLq0tNcHc82 URMnCYmwrJG5s66mti4kpi+gOIiapCJUwDNXTLm+bEaJPzN3OvSL X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGXnOYPMwH8CcEX88DcteYdz06dIISY8rJsPsOrxHyDjEEeq/M+CtNmuEl6hqSqnG1ksxiMJw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:1710:b0:254:c777:6334 with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-25d06e2965fmr12190296fac.42.1719428479563; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 12:01:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd ([204.48.95.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id af79cd13be357-79cedd5adf8sm73645385a.90.2024.06.26.12.01.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 26 Jun 2024 12:01:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer In-Reply-To: (Leo Famulari's message of "Wed, 26 Jun 2024 10:38:24 -0400") References: <9d7077d1a696c226666c6230d95c0cc84f1fa58c.1717597818.git.ashish.is@lostca.se> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:01:17 -0400 Message-ID: <87le2rbkaq.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Spam-Score: 3.63 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 4FE6E756C4 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 3.63 X-TUID: AESJuE3xgCIi Hi Leo, Leo Famulari writes: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 10:25:40AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 04:07:52AM +0000, Ashish SHUKLA via Guix-patches via wrote: >> > I'm wondering why is this bug report closed, as I don't see any commit >> > to git derivation in the master branch atm. >> >> This patched was pushed to master as commit 26c0ff98cf4302fc69539272d646c0ef28991991 >> >> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=26c0ff98cf4302fc69539272d646c0ef28991991 >> >> Now, I see that some other change was included to >> 'gnu/packages/linux.scm', probably by accident. I'm going to look into >> that now. > > I went ahead and reverted this change to bcc, leaving the Git update in > place. > > Maxim, let us know if I shouldn't have done that, and the bcc change > should be reinstated. Seems I had squashed the bcc change in the wrong commit while working on a stack of patches to commit. It's still useful (as 'guix lint bcc' would say), so I've reinstated that in its own commit and the git update too: 03459ca165 master gnu: git: Update to 2.45.2. a3b8a9627b gnu: bcc: Add bash-minimal to inputs. Thanks for the heads-up. -- Maxim