From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57140) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d73fe-0007OJ-O9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 13:39:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d73fa-0006PH-RG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 13:39:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60305) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d73fa-0006PA-FI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 13:39:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d73fa-0002FY-5T for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 13:39:02 -0400 Subject: bug#26713: [PATCH] gnu: Move netsurf to web-browsers.scm. Resent-Message-ID: From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <87h90ygd0j.fsf@openmailbox.org> References: <20170429220942.26880-1-kei@openmailbox.org> <20170430191306.GA26169@jasmine> <87shkpoehf.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87o9vdo805.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87lgqaghsh.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87pofmypni.fsf@fastmail.com> <87h90ygd0j.fsf@openmailbox.org> Date: Sat, 06 May 2017 19:38:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87k25tzy07.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Kei Kebreau Cc: 26713@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Kei Kebreau writes: > Marius Bakke writes: >> >> There are other things using netsurf-build-system as well, so I would >> just leave it for now. > > I intend to copy, not move, netsurf-build-system into web-browsers.scm > so that NetSurf can build. There are many other packages in web.scm using netsurf-build-system. IMO it would be "cleaner" to have all that in a "netsurf" module, but I'm not sure if it's worth the hassle. The current patch duplicates netsurf-build-system, which means we have to maintain it two different places. I think we should avoid that. >> Also some copyright information is missing in the patch. > > What information in particular? Netsurf was added in 2016, but web-browsers.scm only includes 2017. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlkOChgACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPrkrQf/SZeYLbdXm8J43XuJUtkcJV/CAcx1ph2mmQk1jnovFIQkZHDq2ntvUUd+ 7b1O8emHhtZPZ1oPttumooqGf/eN3cDygInzoXVTTNvR9Nue+3pl+/QvcITxGwu8 UUbe8T6T1ociDKuWPQ93Qx7aDb4scCOY/vRhru9pqMD3ZJOL++Rc9gf+BRmQbMcQ 3ZCaUIxV6dwOZpAlscV3OVEC08/xdVwEfD6YA3tSvAIofD7Q9wkxAs8zNJVVtA2K gdydhImcKvv8JFQAyRqg4mUcStsYmPZlE7KlF/hwWcQgTfNbFZRxGaM92s6ZtZJO Oa67wkq90wyfwFXJWrLZsR0y+nqlPA== =7QQ8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--