From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45421)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dnjIz-00065U-Hs
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 06:36:09 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dnjIw-0006xR-DR
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 06:36:05 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58761)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1dnjIw-0006xH-9p
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 06:36:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dnjIv-00076X-UL
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 06:36:01 -0400
Subject: [bug#27850] gnu: mpi: openmpi: Don't enable thread-multiple
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.27850.D27850.150426212827267@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Dave Love <fx@gnu.org>
References: <87wp6thqjc.fsf@i-ulialbion.it.manchester.ac.uk>
	<87379c4oxs.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87o9s0bhro.fsf@i-ulialbion.it.manchester.ac.uk>
	<87lgn3skmm.fsf@inria.fr>
	<87tw1r9sss.fsf@i-ulialbion.it.manchester.ac.uk>
	<87bmnzxk50.fsf@inria.fr>
	<874ltr9hhs.fsf@i-ulialbion.it.manchester.ac.uk>
	<87o9r9t5yy.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8wyh77z.fsf@albion.it.manchester.ac.uk>
	<87r2w2j7eb.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 11:35:23 +0100
In-Reply-To: <87r2w2j7eb.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?Court\=E8s\?\=
	\=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?\=22's\?\= message of "Wed, 23
	Aug 2017 23:34:04 +0200")
Message-ID: <87k21izoyc.fsf@albion.it.manchester.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 27850-done@debbugs.gnu.org

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> Dave Love <fx@gnu.org> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> I went ahead and applied the patch you posted, minus the extra outputs,
>>
>> What's the problem with a runtime output?
>
> It=E2=80=99s mostly that this should be a separate patch, as discussed ea=
rlier.

OK.  I've lost track, sorry.  I'll have another look.

> It=E2=80=99s not a problem per se as long as it does help reduce the size=
 of
> what people commonly install, which is not obvious to me.

I'm afraid I don't know about "commonly", particularly with Guix, but
I'm surprised if people would expect to get the respective MPI
development environment for an MPI program they install any more than
they'd expect the compiler generally.  The separation other
distributions have seems appropriate to me as a system manager and
packager -- even if it's not the typical HPC way (Spack et al?) -- but
that's just my opinion.