From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43148) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ejuCj-0007Sm-2u for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 16:58:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ejuCg-0003Gb-1G for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 16:58:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54718) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ejuCf-0003GX-Ts for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 16:58:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ejuCf-0007Q8-MG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 16:58:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#30196] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: services: Add wesnothd service. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20180121183348.29317-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> <20180122121104.11149-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> <87372e6t6s.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 22:57:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Arun Isaac's message of "Thu, 08 Feb 2018 17:42:38 +0530") Message-ID: <87k1vntaa7.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Arun Isaac Cc: 30196@debbugs.gnu.org Arun Isaac skribis: >>> * gnu/services/games.scm: New file. >>> * gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it. >>> * doc/guix.texi (Game Services): Document the service. >> >> LGTM, thanks! > > Thanks, I'll push with the changes you mentioned. > >> You=E2=80=99d get bonus points by writing a system test, but perhaps the= re=E2=80=99s not >> much that could easily be tested. So, no big deal. > > I might be able to write a simple test that checks if the server has > started successfully and is listening on port 15000. But, this seems too > trivial a test to me. Is it worth it? WDYT? Yeah I thought about it, probably not worth it. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.