From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58930) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNf7z-00089l-DW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 11:02:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNf7y-0008Of-Id for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 11:02:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43655) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNf7y-0008OV-FG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 11:02:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hNf7y-0000q4-7c for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 11:02:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#35467] [PATCH] Update Emacs packages. Resent-Message-ID: References: From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 17:01:24 +0200 Message-ID: <87k1f3fwzf.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Brian Leung Cc: 35467@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Brian, thank you for these patches. I have applied these files: 0002-gnu-emacs-hl-todo-Update-to-3.0.0.patch 0004-gnu-emacs-elfeed-Update-to-3.1.0.patch 0005-gnu-emacs-evil-nerd-commenter-Update-to-3.3.7.patch The other two patches update packages to unreleased versions, which we usually avoid unless there=E2=80=99s a very good reason to pick a version mid-release. Could you tell us why the upgrades to emacs-highlight-symbol and emacs-avy are needed? -- Ricardo