From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44355) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1haUna-0004TT-SZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 20:38:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1haUnZ-0000ij-RN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 20:38:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44158) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1haUnZ-0000ib-Oc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 20:38:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1haUnZ-0004Bl-JH for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 20:38:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#36162] [PATCH 0/4] Add 'remote-eval' Resent-Message-ID: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44087) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1haUmS-0004KS-7N for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 20:36:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1haUmR-00084F-Bw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 20:36:52 -0400 From: zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) References: <875zpgrjqf.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87h88x7pni.fsf@gnu.org> <871s01l4c2.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 20:35:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <871s01l4c2.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> (Jakob L. Kreuze's message of "Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:47:57 -0400") Message-ID: <87k1dtj6vr.fsf_-_@sdf.lonestar.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 36162@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wow, this is great! It seems like this patch series is implementing a number of things I'd been wishing I could just import from some other Guix module. I'm signing off for the night, but I'll apply this tomorrow and give you some feedback. Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > There are no tests for =E2=80=98remote-eval=E2=80=99 currently. It would= need a VM > with access to the store, as Jakob explained on guix-devel. One idea I had in developing my test suite was to design another record type to supplement '' for tests that /do/ need access the host's store as they're running, but thought it would be too intrusive as it would only be used by the tests for '(gnu machine)'. Now that we have a =E2=80=98remote-eval=E2=80=99 that would benefit from being tested t= hat way, though, I'd like to ask: is that something I should look into? Thanks again for implementing this Jakob --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEa1VJLOiXAjQ2BGSm9Qb9Fp2P2VoFAlz+92gACgkQ9Qb9Fp2P 2VozIBAArDNu/lyrc7/lmR3m3BsfYxsleNnoYOi1bDAmb5JnBmOpk94SUPafvBI8 2MJOi2g6ik6DrBZ15/orf0zobWPetHj5TNWMvWCS20a74drn3Bd8nT788+K3J9Cw PSI6izEPnhVeuBpl19CItXtNIiHhDguRjiOe9fYMASDdgnHNmqWpO0w07dEpRIGi 0i+Qdnf6MshmGYuLLS/JwGQpsnXn/6TTzT3hrMDXoDG2Rux2nHE+bHy3MH3PleDH dWxcTbvma6AcvWO8Dw9ViMLUaUOt7GTOpZn6oom+pkl6pYGuWvWF8pYA1woGDKIT MqZ8k10w8Rc0vG+m+yJBzBuncsp4YbVI5g/oXRkimPwBAPFwUPuMamrSqCE1uoel hxvll+CPVs0NuDDN6ogWe7XiECUIGK7xPPqfZ8x5Em95jhwULlb98HgoZTUb8vhU gzvtzMcVRKhnPuUPYu43eP4Rnu1jllcElw8md5d+l1Sd7IZIspcOckykxA4zXZZU 1MHI21LXy+EcbEX7DPXlgTxXShhF7GXRMxE9KzwCklOFM11PSWtOsOAQGGywGhU0 t0BSw41o3zavMc5KMkoL5Lg+tnYbLrlVUwn2iIfK1jxyX3NqsUGxw54UVCXP2HJe l6MOxQWraDlOcKCAZqx5hMM8GHDXZtdUlfNUFhzPXNlbIrKtVmU= =YO+c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--