From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47854) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMS5o-0007NM-Pl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 03:27:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMS5n-00008z-Qg for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 03:27:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46835) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMS5n-00008s-NB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 03:27:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMS5m-0005XM-FK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 03:27:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#37714] Add renpy package Resent-Message-ID: From: Nicolas Goaziou References: <87d0et96lm.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 09:26:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Leo Prikler's message of "Sun, 20 Oct 2019 14:09:54 +0200") Message-ID: <87k18y7e5j.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Leo Prikler Cc: 37714@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, Leo Prikler writes: > Am Samstag, den 19.10.2019, 22:59 +0200 schrieb Leo Prikler: >> - 0003 splits renpy into the python package python2-renpy and the >> program itself. This makes the build rules a little easier to read, >> even if they themselves did not change much. > Now also with a package description for python2-renpy. >> - 0004 fixes the launcher (mostly). One can now set a project >> directory, create projects, launch created projects and open project >> directories in the default file explorer. However, setting the editor >> (and hence launching one) still does not work. > Adjusted accordingly. > - 0005 uses pre-install renpy to compile the games. I've also updated > the comments on #:tests? that are inaccurate as of 0002. Could you squeeze all those patches into a single one and send it again? Thank you for all the work so far! Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou