From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id aKSaMClc0l77eQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 30 May 2020 13:14:17 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id YGhbLClc0l5MPAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 30 May 2020 13:14:17 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52DB5940665 for ; Sat, 30 May 2020 13:14:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42496 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jf1JT-0006XB-9m for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 30 May 2020 09:14:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49812) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jf1JL-0006WL-LX for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2020 09:14:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45601) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jf1JK-0000k6-IW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2020 09:14:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jf1JK-0000zl-Cf for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2020 09:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#41345] 000-update-python-argon2-cffi.patch Resent-From: Marius Bakke Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 13:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41345 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Josh Marshall Cc: 41345-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 41345-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D41345.15908443863746 (code D ref 41345); Sat, 30 May 2020 13:14:02 +0000 Received: (at 41345-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2020 13:13:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57147 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jf1IQ-0000yM-J5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2020 09:13:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42266) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jf1IO-0000xr-Ao for 41345-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2020 09:13:05 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34556) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jf1IJ-0008T3-3p; Sat, 30 May 2020 09:12:59 -0400 Received: from ti0006q161-2604.bb.online.no ([84.202.68.75]:33528 helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jf1II-0004Gj-L5; Sat, 30 May 2020 09:12:58 -0400 From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: References: <87o8qi9v8i.fsf@devup.no> <87lflg6owx.fsf@gnu.org> <87a71v7l5d.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 15:12:56 +0200 Message-ID: <87k10t1s87.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.11 X-TUID: vndC8lSyo36I --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Josh Marshall writes: > If those are the particular expectations and standards, should they change > from only policy in the manual to something enforced by a git pre-commit > hook? That's a good idea. I'm not sure about enforcing, but we could have a post-commit hook that complains if all the files are not mentioned in the commit message. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl7SW9gACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPpeLQf/Rdn/tlOKNqsyIqTByjXJfJGFoFrsPvREx6cEy5HjLPSf9+ClrNjcmbLC a6S4gGgDxrhCqMVxfAbXIjGD4OfCT5HG+g6jmXNENSqiQPlZl9ou0YhYfhyThO6D cJuXm9+qabnUyimPPf5ELvJHNoDiw6Xrqj4jSmyG2P285XWg7/pBl97X0dxaSlv+ CTjkH6zUAnaBwvoe+dMKjbTgxPMenv246x1L8wqLUCms1wqZ12YgnHStq1vVuFj+ ReKJ/iSRqdInxoKGgBdEoHaYFNy9QWr8qOI4KbtMGVAF/i95kJw1UZKkA4tijUgk cJ6l4OlFbTxtYncZABnmf/1Jxbe8Zw== =23gG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--