From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id QHRNF+Dt315jNQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 20:15:28 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id kCc/E+Dt3177ZQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 20:15:28 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F123940363 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 20:15:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:47554 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jikea-0006zx-KR for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 16:15:24 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59580) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jikbK-0002YS-VZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 16:12:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49463) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jikbK-00067P-L4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 16:12:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jikbK-0002XI-GB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 16:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#40579] [PATCH v2] gnu: Add iPXE. Resent-From: Brice Waegeneire Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 20:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40579 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Vincent Legoll Cc: Danny Milosavljevic , 40579@debbugs.gnu.org, me@tobias.gr Received: via spool by 40579-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40579.15917335169735 (code B ref 40579); Tue, 09 Jun 2020 20:12:02 +0000 Received: (at 40579) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2020 20:11:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32776 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jikbE-0002Ww-0P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 16:11:56 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:58467) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jikbC-0002Wf-9F for 40579@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 16:11:55 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 78.237.113.178 Received: from localhost (luy13-1-78-237-113-178.fbx.proxad.net [78.237.113.178]) (Authenticated sender: brice@waegenei.re) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5B71E0005; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 20:11:46 +0000 (UTC) From: Brice Waegeneire References: <87tv1ommhu.fsf@nckx> <20200412232831.5876-1-me@tobias.gr> <20200415224134.2014eee9@scratchpost.org> <87wo4gf334.fsf@waegenei.re> <6591cb7c-601d-dc58-f4a4-10999caecfa9@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 22:11:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <6591cb7c-601d-dc58-f4a4-10999caecfa9@gmail.com> (Vincent Legoll's message of "Tue, 9 Jun 2020 21:58:55 +0200") Message-ID: <87k10gf18g.fsf@waegenei.re> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.49 X-TUID: pWRP3sclNQ4d Vincent Legoll writes: > On 09/06/2020 21:31, Brice Waegeneire wrote: >> Danny Milosavljevic writes: >> >>> ipxe.iso is not reproducible it seems. >>> >>> [...] >> The attached patch should be reproducible, it is based on v3 from >> Vincent. >> It adds the following: >> - generate a BUILD_ID based on the package's output hash >> - use 'let' to set BUILD_TIMESTAMP >> - set some useful options >> - add a patch that reset the timestamps of ipxe.iso > > Nice and thanks for taking care of this, I've got less time to > contribute lately. > > Did you try to upstream the reproducibility patch ? > Should be straightforward enough. No problem :) No I didn't submit it to upstream, I got frighten by the answers to a much smaller patch from a Debian team member about reproduciblity[0][1]. Those threads were useful to make our build reproducible tho. [0]: https://lists.ipxe.org/pipermail/ipxe-devel/2020-May/007023.html [1]: https://lists.ipxe.org/pipermail/ipxe-devel/2020-May/007051.html - Brice