From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id OO2wLhyVc2SkdQEASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 28 May 2023 19:53:32 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id uKDcLhyVc2ThmAAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 28 May 2023 19:53:32 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 621C59B92 for ; Sun, 28 May 2023 19:53:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q3KZl-0002po-EN; Sun, 28 May 2023 13:53:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q3KZj-0002pD-9E for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 13:53:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q3KZj-0007Vg-1K for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 13:53:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q3KZi-0000fo-Cx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 13:53:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#53995] (no subject) References: <87r185y4gm.fsf@ngraves.fr> In-Reply-To: <87r185y4gm.fsf@ngraves.fr> Resent-From: Tyler Wolf Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 17:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53995 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 53995@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 53995-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53995.16852963502536 (code B ref 53995); Sun, 28 May 2023 17:53:02 +0000 Received: (at 53995) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2023 17:52:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54639 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q3KZC-0000eq-4S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 13:52:30 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:43265) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q3KZ9-0000eZ-UX for 53995@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 13:52:28 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E63D5240027 for <53995@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 28 May 2023 19:52:21 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1685296341; bh=BwK9Tv7qWYKJ0LvbwRQa8j6rPgOcHwlyRhxNRou4jlY=; h=From:To:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=Znvnd842jWZ0tlKQ43ZA0D/uW3K8JmrVq0Uik1TsHaFhWlenYNrEBYUFKnLEx51zM xMeI/NSb6TbLmog8lMTeU75NF6bSkpa0IY3qmKTmiF7AM9pPviIqDIEb+JBp6lyC24 U1K4U2iIfLsHfda3VEJp069sL4m5Dw/74rBQ3CSu4S8xxFsJE/NJmGsL4FLaAPpspk LbP+mV+K5ExbKelsjWCPlX+LCvIczifJt3YZ275y986/swyJsgJ4rOx0YHAtFJQhI6 XwLubtrotKaIroq/cxkHVJpjAeqAEa5JwhI34Ch6MPWiTO9SRkmCRcJdKuTeHoE7B+ KKMMzeQQIcFng== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4QTmT123LWz9rxH for <53995@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 28 May 2023 19:52:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Tyler Wolf Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 17:52:20 +0000 Message-ID: <87jzwsbay3.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1685296412; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=mBc41eSm7+HDYUuAyUKVKInJ35YVPmMX58gsrJT2Zxm8ImHwv0dCh0yxoczIEP/bzB6GRU NDP57SHf9rbMJ1gnuegAQi8keJPy01RO9PVoxzFjWQM7VZYPvjtl6nmcM9tn5njhQBunbp J0JHZvzoaDxUDIyXEnfSgO3KOZ1AKrWU11g5IatPQrWtF+1QUgzNoLq0NNWg9cs6aaZhrX 2ateBr4uuBab+zafHBiq8bVzC37u36+f5FOgsBD83yZYSJ87nbufjQaN4jP1+1zJmd34IA hZmxJ5yF/2OKT2vgRx3WAY/L4DDEDSzRFH39pPohuj21/J1/oJx2suTul4HYzg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=Znvnd842; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1685296412; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=BwK9Tv7qWYKJ0LvbwRQa8j6rPgOcHwlyRhxNRou4jlY=; b=g1L7ZI5+d/P14mt11BkVj3DL+DJ5B0J45BXFg6EdkXK2awgGVPZSzp2cUxE0ZXTh6sYXZm 0wOGV8Fn7odJlSOeSvfG4p8r9xWd3JePG9+yHTj8h7L0cGBfU3tw5WYX6E6PjnP9ETieNf cBOm2kaFk1YM5PajgYxe88DKP+uzJpg+SaXWu+kCNmPMc2ejJho5iobsnVZazx/QHu6fS6 GBu06RcL1JcsA/ZEj8QKmI9+rnzL5p1L9m/tPd3LWKNEo8A04QkZqgLcVcnD5mIj5la1C+ KLINlZxp2hG3B25NujIIjm8FQiqDxidk2AUbrhnt+TBqwukff5I2Ep4ZyNKhog== X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.28 X-Spam-Score: -5.28 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 621C59B92 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=Znvnd842; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-TUID: y2+XlSOWwUWk Hi, I noticed that rbw is still on 1.4.1 (no longer usable). Is this still an issue with rust-rsa, as it seems to build fine for me so if that is the only issue does that mean the new rbw can be patched, or is there something else. Thanks!