From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60548) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dl0ah-0000Bv-6I for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:27:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dl0ac-0006TX-4r for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:27:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44628) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dl0ac-0006TR-15 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:27:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dl0ab-0001US-RW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:27:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#27907] [PATCH] graph: Provide access to the package record in the emit Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <87lgn3w0n6.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 00:26:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87lgn3w0n6.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Tue, 01 Aug 2017 21:25:49 +0200") Message-ID: <87inhchab4.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Roel Janssen Cc: 27907@debbugs.gnu.org Hi! ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis: > Roel Janssen skribis: > >> I would like to expand the Cypher back-end and in the long run add a >> SPARQL graph back-end to GNU Guix. For this, I will need to have access >> to the package records inside the emit-* functions. >> >> This patch makes this change by essentially changing the "label" >> parameter of the emit-* functions passed as "(node-label head)" into a >> "node" parameter, passed as "head". >> >> The rest of the patch adapts the current emit-* functions to this >> change. >> >> I tested the Graphviz, D3js, and Cypher back-ends, and all seem to work >> as before. >> >> Is it OK to apply this change? > > Sure, looks good to me! Actually no! :-) The problem was that it broke all non-package-related =E2=80=9Cnode types= =E2=80=9D (like =E2=80=9Cguix graph -t references=E2=80=9D), and it had the problem that it= ignores the =E2=80=98label=E2=80=99 procedure in . And =E2=80=9Cmake check= =E2=80=9D failed. So I reverted it in 5e60bef9802e448924f889d34d95a249b008652c. We need to rethink about it. Cheers, Ludo=E2=80=99.