ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hello Marius! > > Marius Bakke skribis: > >> * gnu/packages/patches/binutils-aarch64-symbol-relocation.patch: New file. >> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Register it. >> * gnu/packages/base.scm (binutils-sans-bug-22764): New public variable. >> * gnu/packages/linux.scm (make-linux-libre)[native-inputs]: On aarch64, define >> new ld-wrapper with the above binutils and use it. > > Woohoo, excellent! > >> +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/binutils-aarch64-symbol-relocation.patch >> @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ >> +Fix a regression in Binutils 2.30 where some symbols are incorrectly assumed >> +to be addresses: >> + >> +https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22764 >> + >> +Patch taken from upstream (with ChangeLog entries omitted): >> + >> +https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=279b2f94168ee91e02ccd070d27c983fc001fe12 >> + >> +diff --git a/bfd/elfnn-aarch64.c b/bfd/elfnn-aarch64.c >> +index af448f9..2737773 100644 >> +--- a/bfd/elfnn-aarch64.c >> ++++ b/bfd/elfnn-aarch64.c >> +@@ -7189,10 +7189,19 @@ elfNN_aarch64_check_relocs (bfd *abfd, struct bfd_link_info *info, >> + #if ARCH_SIZE == 64 >> + case BFD_RELOC_AARCH64_32: >> + #endif >> +- if (bfd_link_pic (info) >> +- && (sec->flags & SEC_ALLOC) != 0 >> +- && (sec->flags & SEC_READONLY) != 0) >> ++ if (bfd_link_pic (info) && (sec->flags & SEC_ALLOC) != 0) >> + { >> ++ if (h != NULL >> ++ /* This is an absolute symbol. It represents a value instead >> ++ of an address. */ >> ++ && ((h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_defined >> ++ && bfd_is_abs_section (h->root.u.def.section)) >> ++ /* This is an undefined symbol. */ >> ++ || h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_undefined)) >> ++ break; >> ++ >> ++ /* For local symbols, defined global symbols in a non-ABS section, >> ++ it is assumed that the value is an address. */ >> + int howto_index = bfd_r_type - BFD_RELOC_AARCH64_RELOC_START; >> + _bfd_error_handler >> + /* xgettext:c-format */ > > Perhaps you can omit the ld/testsuite bits that follow (I don’t think we > run this test suite, do we?). Good idea. I dropped the tests since we don't use them and pushed as cdbcfc113bfc02e58bdf6ec42c545c479681602f.