[bug#35288] [PATCH 1/3] gnu: Add dumb.

[Kei Kebreau <kkebreau@posteo.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1599 bytes --]

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Kei Kebreau <kkebreau@posteo.net> skribis:
>
>> * gnu/packages/music.scm (dumb): New variable.
>
> [...]
>
>> +    (home-page "https://github.com/kode54/dumb")
>> +    (synopsis "Module audio renderer library")
>> +    (description
>> + "DUMB is a tracker library with support for IT, XM, S3M and MOD
>> files.  It
>> +targets maximum accuracy to the original formats, with low-pass
>> resonant filters
>> +for the IT files, accurate timing and pitching, and three resampling quality
>> +settings (aliasing, linear interpolation and cubic interpolation).")
>> +    (license (license:fsf-free "file://LICENSE"))))
>
> This looks good, but the license deserves close reading (which I haven’t
> done).  What’s your interpretation of it?  It would be nice to put a
> comment above to summarize our findings.
>

I've added the comment below in the patch summarizing my interpretation
of the DUMB license:

;; The DUMB license is a bit peculiar.
;; Clause 8 states that clauses 4, 5 and 6 are null and void, leaving only
;; the first three clauses for genuine consideration.
;; Clauses 1, 2 and 3 are analogous to clauses 1, 2 and 3 of the zlib
;; license, a known free software license.
;; Therefore, the DUMB license may be considered a free software license.

What do you think?

>> +(define-public vcvrack
>> +  (package
>> +    (name "vcvrack")
>> +    (version "0.6.2b")
>
> What’s this doin’ here?  :-)
>

Very basic packaging work on some other software, whoops!

> Thanks,
> Ludo’.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]