From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54623)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iAZ9p-0003Lb-JG
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 08:34:09 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iAZ9o-0002xr-Hk
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 08:34:05 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44890)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1iAZ9m-0002x2-LF
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 08:34:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iAZ9m-00009s-Hf
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 08:34:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#37413] [PATCH 0/9] Channel news distribution mechanism
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.37413.B37413.1568810029588@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
References: <20190916225258.yd4uzgcm4lyr5zgz@pelzflorian.localdomain>
 <87improzwm.fsf@gnu.org>
 <20190917133307.lhsouulr5yynzzrd@pelzflorian.localdomain>
 <87blvjm485.fsf@gnu.org>
 <20190917142819.qk6thhoocnci6svn@pelzflorian.localdomain>
 <87ef0fkknq.fsf@gnu.org>
 <20190917174102.edmbljhpte5rklsr@pelzflorian.localdomain>
 <20190917202035.1e2e5515@sybil.lepiller.eu>
 <20190917194415.ripfxwfmpx337z4d@pelzflorian.localdomain>
 <87woe5disi.fsf@gnu.org>
 <20190918114945.elbzrp6sqziylkz2@pelzflorian.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 14:33:36 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20190918114945.elbzrp6sqziylkz2@pelzflorian.localdomain>
 (pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de's message of "Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:49:46
 +0200")
Message-ID: <87imppbx7j.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de>
Cc: 37413@debbugs.gnu.org

"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de> skribis:

>> My feeling is that this use case doesn=E2=80=99t correspond to what the =
TP is
>> about, but yeah, you could ask them.
>>
>
> I will ask them, but later after Guix website translation is online.

Oops, thanks for the reminder.  :-)

>> Also, =E2=80=9Curgently=E2=80=9D won=E2=80=99t work because they would h=
ave to be manual
>> intervention by at least two people before the info reaches translators:
>> someone on the Guix side who=E2=80=99d submit a tarball (?) to the TP, a=
nd the
>
> The channel author would submit the tarball.  No Guix team involved.

If it=E2=80=99s the 'guix channel, then the Guix team is definitely involve=
d,
and typically there=E2=80=99s only a couple of people in the group =E2=80=
=9Centitled=E2=80=9D to
do that (so far it=E2=80=99s been Julien or myself.)

Sending a whole tarball seems overkill to me; currently we don=E2=80=99t ev=
en
send them tarballs in between releases, even though that=E2=80=99d be usefu=
l.

Anyway, let=E2=80=99s see what the TP folks think!

Ludo=E2=80=99.