From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34391)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ioQf0-0004tQ-Lm
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 06:35:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ioQez-0002c3-Nn
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 06:35:02 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39289)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1ioQez-0002by-Km
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 06:35:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ioQez-0007wT-IR
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 06:35:01 -0500
Subject: [bug#38986] Acknowledgement ([PATCH] gnu: Add peg.)
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.38986.B38986.157831046830486@debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <20200106113042.33516-1-josh@inv.alid.pw>
 <handler.38986.B.157831030530212.ack@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Josh Holland <josh@inv.alid.pw>
In-reply-to: <handler.38986.B.157831030530212.ack@debbugs.gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 11:34:21 +0000
Message-ID: <87imlo7r9e.fsf@inv.alid.pw>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: 38986@debbugs.gnu.org

FWIW, if maintainers prefer, this package could also justifiably be
named `pegleg`.  I stuck with the upstream tarball name for now.

--
Josh Holland