From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41211)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j2Dhu-0005OB-VN
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 07:35:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j2Dht-00011L-SW
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 07:35:02 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53423)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1j2Dht-00011E-P5
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 07:35:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j2Dht-0003rg-Lx
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 07:35:01 -0500
Subject: [bug#39587] [PATCH] gnu: Add haproxy.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.39587.B39587.158159729414841@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Jelle Licht <jlicht@fsfe.org>
In-Reply-To: <28e680a858a6ccf14c870882c9ecb07b@waegenei.re>
References: <20200213090615.29979-1-brice@waegenei.re>
 <87lfp6vnvr.fsf@jlicht.xyz> <28e680a858a6ccf14c870882c9ecb07b@waegenei.re>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 13:34:50 +0100
Message-ID: <87imkavf6d.fsf@jlicht.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Brice Waegeneire <brice@waegenei.re>
Cc: 39587@debbugs.gnu.org, Guix-patches <guix-patches-bounces+brice+lists=waegenei.re@gnu.org>

Brice Waegeneire <brice@waegenei.re> writes:

> On 2020-02-13 09:26, Jelle Licht wrote:
>>   Is there any particular reason to pass '/bin' instead of the=20
>> (default)
>>   '/sbin' here?
> I wrongly though it wasn't used in Guix. It'll be removed.
>
>>   It seems there are some tests included with haproxy using something
>>   called 'VTest', in `scripts/run-regtests.sh' for example.
> Those are regression tests, are they really useful for us?
I guess not :-)

>>> +    (license (list license:gpl2+
>>> +                   license:lgpl2.1))))
>>                               ^ haproxy header files are licensed under
>>                               lgpl2.1+, at least according to
>> `doc/coding-style.txt'
> The include files I opened, where =C2=AB [...] version 2.1 exclusively. =
=C2=BB.=20
> I'll append lgpl2.1+ for the header files without a license header.
Good catch then!=20