From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id MKlDJPjYMV9FdAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 23:32:08 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id qFwmIPjYMV89YgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 23:32:08 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E772F9403D2 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 23:32:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39922 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5HGw-0000xD-KD for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 19:32:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35398) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5HGs-0000x3-Cd for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 19:32:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54550) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5HGs-000570-2q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 19:32:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k5HGr-0002Qv-U6 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 19:32:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#42807] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: darktable: Update to 3.2.1. Resent-From: Brett Gilio Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 23:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42807 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Vinicius Monego Cc: 42807@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 42807-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42807.15971022729296 (code B ref 42807); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 23:32:01 +0000 Received: (at 42807) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Aug 2020 23:31:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37863 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k5HG4-0002Pr-8P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 19:31:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53156) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k5HG1-0002Pe-Rn for 42807@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 19:31:10 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60293) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5HFu-0004x1-Is; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 19:31:03 -0400 Received: from [2605:6000:1a0d:48fb::e9] (port=53498 helo=lenovo-t430) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1k5HFt-0005Gg-Pw; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 19:31:02 -0400 From: Brett Gilio References: <20200810232325.61515-1-monego@posteo.net> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 18:31:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20200810232325.61515-1-monego@posteo.net> (Vinicius Monego's message of "Mon, 10 Aug 2020 20:23:25 -0300") Message-ID: <87imdqcc3a.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: od4xizJJeMZn Vinicius Monego writes: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > + ;; Build fails with every version of GCC. > (setenv "CC" "clang") (setenv "CXX" "clang++") --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Hey, is this issue with GCC reported upstream? I'm not opposed to compiling against clang<++>, especially since it is already in the closure for the package. But if there is a reported issue for this, the ticket number should be referenced in the comment ideally. Otherwise, could you report it? Thanks! Brett Gilio