From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id GNQzMOugX19WQwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:57:15 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id UI5vKuugX18QFAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:57:15 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19E0994036A for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:57:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48046 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHrmz-0003wd-Gx for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:57:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39198) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHrmo-0003kk-6b for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:57:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44517) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHrmn-0002U6-RF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:57:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHrmn-0001FM-QG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:57:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#26899] bbs100 Resent-From: Ricardo Wurmus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26899 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: zimoun Cc: 26899@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 26899-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26899.16001025864745 (code B ref 26899); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:57:01 +0000 Received: (at 26899) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2020 16:56:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56063 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHrmB-0001EO-0o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:56:26 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21119) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kHrm6-0001E8-4G for 26899@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:56:22 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1600102573; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=ExbXMpfpvIBpIjWR1jYO63mybEA9fWgY3nqEBci2VMIcvNpOTVL42lxTwJik+qsbqUEHqEP76YQtPpUtvAuzz1Cgm5mtym6CMAUzlnWSNsrBcaaTUSKf0hN+nMI3F78/GhSKDojNNPDkSSu3g3JN5uhklII8wPkNszPz0iYBZ9A= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1600102573; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=V44d7vSu6ULGonjT4+uZ3+bLytYGS8+aOj2c8unl5RE=; b=RbwFD3L3kMLSfYb6Ffc8bTFwIkdxf7N7/7GURaWQGXe/URrThYQln6ffQUrIucURuBSTk6J9y8niMWEFjmhMb6Le+7NyM+Yr2HAs+6r6TMtU5GAe/uehhKrSxhTktwpirqgWU/RlZamNlduMri+fFfZ/rnLrr535t1GdEVTODTc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1600102573; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=V44d7vSu6ULGonjT4+uZ3+bLytYGS8+aOj2c8unl5RE=; b=g8JzxSKeWjVXLrHpWsAWd5M0vszhD1j1nlNrQp0lx/YUHxJg4LMJ3/ScKDlwM7Xv gHuNqu6e+xaWas8AHhqBXlrjRRVushyMKO95lnOFaVhn1WcpeE9dNA7oT0PtLzMR7+2 vsJjV7H7hqHGxxFEsH7cAxLiqIw2SxCr8KRakY0A= Received: from localhost (p54ad4c23.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.76.35]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1600102571031313.78853374019116; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:56:11 -0700 (PDT) References: <20170512173404.dm6ndiajbpatcs42@abyayala> <87mu1sqqk3.fsf@gmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: <87mu1sqqk3.fsf@gmail.com> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 18:57:28 +0200 Message-ID: <87imcgxpmv.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=elephly.net header.s=zoho header.b=g8JzxSKe; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.99 X-TUID: peZVaFZUTqFP zimoun writes: > On Fri, 12 May 2017 at 17:34, ng0 wrote: >> This adds bbs100. For possible past reviews search the guix-devel@gnu.or= g archive. >> --=20 >> https://pragmatique.xyz >> PGP: https://people.pragmatique.xyz/ng0/ >> >> From 09746bd8021235c7c27bae10b4574011ea4e7f2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: ng0 >> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 00:37:52 +0000 >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add bbs100. >> >> * gnu/packages/bbs.scm: New file. >> * gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add bbs.scm. >> --- >> gnu/local.mk | 1 + >> gnu/packages/bbs.scm | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= +++++++ >> 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 gnu/packages/bbs.scm > > What is the status of this old patch? Does it make to review it? The source code has disappeared and the home page says that it=E2=80=99s deprecated. I=E2=80=99m not opposed to adding it, though perhaps not in its own module. But if the only person interested in adding it no longer cares about it, I think we can close this issue. --=20 Ricardo