From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:5f26::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id KK/tIY7IgmX81wAAkFu2QA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 11:57:18 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id SK1CHY7IgmVlWgAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 11:57:18 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=wmeyer.eu header.s=mail header.b=DRqmB6zX; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=wmeyer.eu (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1703069838; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=wPtvNW5kYxGtB++2e6Qm6MOCUoLVOZnsbE5tLL/vuNM=; b=oyyockvbxGk2W6t2zdRDdRwHsbgSULwWTOcGj1XG/dNhJhbD57xO6m+VZmJbGMx/WW/SOj q72Ivh8Tuae7LSE0HbtgCs5jOoEBFELj4byXxBI4cvea3UgDQO4hvoadPRX6niVOSZ91ES /EB5Ij61LSvZhtSQyzOZ0VWLSbt8D4w7sxbmOamZKCe/T69AyrxeCar3LegUxRUMGsAW4q gQ1ldBR4MLqb096o0S32uPzbMOS+ZgSzkUbDDIN7GzjDI7GjazMt/XTQ3mgsmsHR0Xfjrn kJk7LtQtO4S++HWp1ZM3LYGJri6TWiU2cvfHBt1u+6AbP5L5/vqSMrGxqLwwtA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=wmeyer.eu header.s=mail header.b=DRqmB6zX; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=wmeyer.eu (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1703069838; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=dgDsLyjRc3DRXVl6NWtIXSFXHyQfFHJxaNCue8QfzdRDQjyFYecgALDJoX+HjWQNGAmH3r WwW3VocpAigYubWgqCuHPN40cszG+MHPc1naZFJvoye1AoXQUI7LpTuUl7qtszXtqKgM4b 2OCilWxWQuSGBxNd6SadsBexaZCJ3cQsrOi2wubTNPC8OW84oKOzVoqfOH1lZGREIq8dFg HAYZ7ggd8d1F6hGDIWXM4rPdMxS+K0fOrYaVqDe84Mbmfrbv1A/4GC/z8tPrTzsdL9eY6m XDcJaAVDPIT44ELs2m953kPGt7jVOf5u4DruQIFU1whRRbdCQyJADXB3b5IwaQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE4D25A253 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 11:57:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rFuG7-0000Up-30; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 05:57:03 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rFuG4-0000UK-8C for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 05:57:00 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rFuG3-00019L-W4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 05:57:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rFuG6-0001b5-G1 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 05:57:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#42338] [PATCH] Add composer build system (PHP) References: <20200713002055.1553f136@tachikoma.lepiller.eu> In-Reply-To: <20200713002055.1553f136@tachikoma.lepiller.eu> Resent-From: Wilko Meyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 10:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42338 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 42338@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 42338-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42338.17030697726078 (code B ref 42338); Wed, 20 Dec 2023 10:57:02 +0000 Received: (at 42338) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2023 10:56:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38712 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rFuFH-0001Zu-UZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 05:56:12 -0500 Received: from mail.wmeyer.eu ([95.216.196.112]:52578) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rFuFE-0001ZU-BW for 42338@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 05:56:10 -0500 From: Wilko Meyer DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wmeyer.eu; s=mail; t=1703069758; bh=wPtvNW5kYxGtB++2e6Qm6MOCUoLVOZnsbE5tLL/vuNM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=DRqmB6zXxeEVwVhd8tliqdQRc/4oC7zFlWBDkRv8p6TKou71sTklBYY4tkwSmlmWG cQV2Oq5eXxPmxjZhplLIDY+a1ijDQ2/ym5zEluYsG2QXwCinufzTt9Hmp4TnqGKPLC eCWDGyEk6fhWCyJBIW4UqXFx/PrQ7qn8x7gfUSSU= Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 11:41:55 +0100 Message-ID: <87il4t9m8u.fsf@wmeyer.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.70 X-Spam-Score: -4.70 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: EE4D25A253 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-TUID: aB7iANZxEVv0 Hi, Just wanted to say thanks for all this work, was really surprised to see a composer-build-system in Guix and a handy packagist importer! As far as I'm aware, there's not a structure in gnu/packages yet for composer packages. Hope this is the right place to ask, I'm considering packaging my more used dependencies for Guix, do they go into php.scm/php-xyz.scm? a yet-to-be-created packagist.scm? Should there be a more thematic grouping (e.g. how python*.scm is currently structured)? Thanks for this great work! -- Kind regards, Wilko Meyer w@wmeyer.eu