From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53120) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0ONl-000734-Ql for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 04:21:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0ONi-0006GL-Lx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 04:21:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55195) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0ONi-0006GB-Hz for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 04:21:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d0ONi-0002TA-7j for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 04:21:02 -0400 Subject: bug#26454: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: add emacs-exwm Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20170411225803.2420-2-tumashu@163.com> <596f39ca.AEUAJFdKV9QAAAAAAAAAAAO0QTIAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABY9Mdm@mailjet.com> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:20:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <596f39ca.AEUAJFdKV9QAAAAAAAAAAAO0QTIAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABY9Mdm@mailjet.com> (Arun Isaac's message of "Mon, 17 Apr 2017 19:17:13 +0530") Message-ID: <87h91mt9dp.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Arun Isaac Cc: 26454@debbugs.gnu.org Hello! Arun Isaac skribis: > I have finished all corrections. And, as far as I can tell, exwm builds > and works fine. If there are no other suggestions, let me know, and I'll > push. I guess you can go ahead. Thanks for finalizing it! > In the patch I just sent, I check if the 'exwm feature is loaded. If it > is not loaded, then a default configuration is loaded. Else, nothing > happens and we proceed assuming the user has configured exwm in their > ~/.emacs. This way, we get a working exwm out of the box and at the same > time, retain the user's ability to customize their exwm easily. > > Though upstream prefers we use the pregenerated source code, I'm afraid > we cannot do that. All Guix packages are strictly built from source. For > now, there is no problem with our own regenerated source code. And, I > don't anticipate there will be many problems in the future. If and when > there is a problem and the package breaks, we will report the problem > upstream as a bug, and take any necessary action to fix our > package. Until then, this should be fine. Makes sense to me. > There seem to be some exwm upstream bugs with floating windows. Apart > from that, it works great. I have switched to exwm from my previous > window manager, dwm. :-) Fun. :-) Thanks to both of you! Ludo=E2=80=99.