From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55888) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d7KfV-0004fs-Pb for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 07 May 2017 07:48:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d7KfR-0008MR-Tf for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 07 May 2017 07:48:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60919) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d7KfR-0008ML-QG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 07 May 2017 07:48:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d7KfR-0001I4-L8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 07 May 2017 07:48:01 -0400 Subject: bug#26803: Java things Resent-Message-ID: References: <87wp9u2ifa.fsf@elephly.net> <590EF853.9010404@crazy-compilers.com> From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: <590EF853.9010404@crazy-compilers.com> Date: Sun, 07 May 2017 13:47:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87h90whorf.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Hartmut Goebel Cc: 26803@debbugs.gnu.org Hartmut Goebel writes: > Am 06.05.2017 um 16:01 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: >> Several months ago Hartmut posted a couple of unfinished patches to >> guix-devel. I thought it wouldn’t be too hard to finish them. I was >> wrong. I still haven’t gotten all of them to build because to do things >> right I would need to package way too many things. > > Thanks for your work. > > Anyway, I suggest to close this and *not* apply this patches. The reason > is: As you may have noticed, I'm working on the maven build system and > most of these packages are to be build using maven. (See > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-04/msg00459.html). I > will take care of integrating your changes into that patch series then. I think these patches are useful already as they are. This does not conflict with a future maven build system, and we can replace the packages later if it turns out that the maven build system handles the builds better. -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net