From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49552) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dkX6c-0004Br-EJ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 10:58:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dkX6Y-0004E3-8n for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 10:58:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42866) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dkX6Y-0004Dv-5y for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 10:58:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dkX6X-0004ol-Ns for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 10:58:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#26685] certbot service experience Resent-Message-ID: References: <87tw56dhlp.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87eft3a804.fsf@gnu.org> <87tw0z4u5k.fsf@gnu.org> From: Christopher Allan Webber In-reply-to: <87tw0z4u5k.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 09:57:50 -0500 Message-ID: <87h8wymivl.fsf@dustycloud.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: wingo@igalia.com, 26685@debbugs.gnu.org, clement@lassieur.org Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi there! > > Tobias Geerinckx-Rice skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès wrote on 26/07/17 at 10:59: >>> Hello Andy, Chris, and Clément! :-) >> >> ...and Ludo', >> >>> Could we decide on what really needs to be done before we push this >>> patch, and what can be done later? It’s a pity that this patch has been >>> sitting there for so long despite being very useful! >> >> Zut alors. I missed that service! Nice. Necessary. >> >>> https://bugs.gnu.org/26685 >> >> If nobody objects, I'd like a few days to play with this before it gets >> merged. It's a fine service, but I think it privileges the ‘--webroot’ >> plugin too much (‘-w’ is a plugin-specific option, not global). I'd >> rather not have my mail box spin up nginx... > > Any update on this? :-) > > Ludo’. My feeling is that it's a good idea to allow for non-webroot configuration, but I think it shouldn't hold us back from moving forward with getting the certbot service in.