From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33386)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1erVdS-0003t2-H7
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 16:21:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1erVdO-00035I-G8
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 16:21:06 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60127)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1erVdO-000358-BY
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 16:21:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1erVdO-0006JF-5m
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 16:21:02 -0500
Subject: [bug#30629] [PATCH 0/5] Detect missing modules in the initrd
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.30629.B30629.151993921624178@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <20180227141720.12513-1-ludo@gnu.org>
	<20180227222632.42bcf52c@scratchpost.org> <87tvu2w2vg.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20180227235027.00bc79b1@scratchpost.org>
	<20180301124655.72f6ca52@scratchpost.org> <87tvtz6hk4.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20180301145528.2411f36b@scratchpost.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 22:20:09 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20180301145528.2411f36b@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's
	message of "Thu, 1 Mar 2018 14:55:28 +0100")
Message-ID: <87h8pz4ho6.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Cc: 30629@debbugs.gnu.org

Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org> skribis:

>> Of course.  What I was suggesting was to push =E2=80=9Cmy=E2=80=9D serie=
s first, then
>> rebase =E2=80=9Cyours=E2=80=9D on top of it without the kmod bits since =
we=20
>
>>can now do
>> without it.
>
> Do you plan to implement depmod in Guile?

I=E2=80=99m not sure what you mean exactly.  We have =E2=80=98module-depend=
encies=E2=80=99 and
=E2=80=98recursive-module-dependencies=E2=80=99 in (gnu build linux-modules=
) to
determine module dependencies by looking at the ELF files.  AFAICS we
don=E2=80=99t need to generate modules.dep and map files, do we?

Ludo=E2=80=99.