From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48645) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fWXxD-0004Nx-I3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 22:07:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fWXx8-0004Jd-Jc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 22:07:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52786) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fWXx8-0004JU-EA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 22:07:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fWXx8-00028N-25 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 22:07:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#30406] gnu: tome4: Add fix to getself.c. Resent-Message-ID: From: Oleg Pykhalov References: <20180209212145.6478-1-go.wigust@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 05:06:37 +0300 In-Reply-To: ("=?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits"'s message of "Fri, 22 Jun 2018 21:34:45 +0200") Message-ID: <87h8lujlxu.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Cc: 30406@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello G=C3=A1bor, G=C3=A1bor Boskovits writes: > I'm reviewing patches before guix 0.15.0. This patchset looks like a good > candidate for inclusion, but patches do not apply cleanly on current > master. Ludo already said that these are ok to push.=20 Thank you for taking your time on it. > Can you create updated patches, and push them, or submit them? I've updated tome4 to 1.5.10 in 972b87b14ae54bacf2457a4d538c5495bec37176 and I'm not sure whether the patch is necessary now. I've found failed built of the previous version on Hydra, so maybe I'll spot a failure for the new version, too. Oleg. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEc+OyAXw1EaDPCmAPckbhHGm3lWkFAlstqy4ACgkQckbhHGm3 lWlsDA/9GSjcN9HrRxBPYO59rIb/sfic4HEHkNB0xYFrStBJQ8OM5LJ+aEakXPP3 jWlltvNfLjAWvO0fDFME2UNZ9LEd65mQDvXEn5seI5xjEiR4u9z/V8T/0Vq5wTIp nRsYRWMZnozDdpaALcBWInGL9p2jIRPNaF/97c8UP7uxO2XoJnKpgYM/yDYSsRu8 1W4FiO2IxCajPAGOefVYfoKW4iNB7h4tipuvYL3cygEk2BCPY0ezGTJZbL7Px+Vb 8ApRgga2JWOswN2c/Z41B3p1Bb6d7+TkQTpru4WrXGYCb64/rip4hl123uYqX38/ rJpwuIuSPxiN0+Wex/QVGN2IgYfdSaQEZy6jNyuESh+pylIoY6EtEsJaBCZ+/LEg Q04yzIr5nbWjAOympbYyX5m+i4SAdctVyFe0YAxxswv3mgSD/k6pGrtURNFOTHfJ BBEcQPOWewHdccIZ21nLaQPF9is0aGpCx4l5ch+9qZalDsxpfkZ5qX19dRxgd59d 5+KwffozuOcQqzJzzt7oR9qmHwEMfPxZe4XtReQWFW1JMEBltXK4Uy80vJskPpzc 3IplgJCIVk5jZZ2tY8U7YFfYtv5qPnbOVTHtwj6H1Y+68M2NfNNZPNC+hal05Zl1 qyVHIF1R916VHI6aAHsKd7GcEMC2LPWvhTxP7ZDCXeGIHRRzUeU= =3pcQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--