From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44518) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fXYv4-0002Jy-3j for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:21:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fXYv0-0007Ap-56 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:21:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55704) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fXYuz-00079v-Ta for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:21:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fXYuz-0007yl-O3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:21:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#31958] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pyblake2. Resent-Message-ID: From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <878t72o9r4.fsf@aikidev.net> References: <87o9g0ne4s.fsf@aikidev.net> <874lhqej9d.fsf@fastmail.com> <878t72o9r4.fsf@aikidev.net> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 23:20:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87h8lqzhq0.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Vagrant Cascadian , 31958@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Vagrant Cascadian writes: >>> + (license license:cc0))) >> >> According to COPYING, this software is actually "octuple-licensed": >> >> * CC0 Universal 1.0 - http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 >> * Unlicense =E2=80=94 http://unlicense.org/ >> * WTFPL Version 2 - http://www.wtfpl.net/ >> * Apache Public License 2.0 - https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >> * OpenSSL License - https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html >> * MIT License - https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT >> * The BSD 3-Clause License - https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause >> * ISC License - https://opensource.org/licenses/ISC >> >> Can you add each of these, along with an explaning comment? > > And all of those are merely fallback licenses to the author's intention > of public domain... and in the files themselves (pyblake2module.c, > setup.py), they only reference: > > http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0 > > But if it's more appropriate for guix to list all possible licenses, > sure. :) Right. I missed the top comment of the COPYING file[0], which dedicates the software to the public domain. But it also says that you are free to choose any of the others at your discretion. So I think CC0 is appropriate, but please add a comment explaning the situation. Thanks! [0] https://github.com/dchest/pyblake2/blob/master/COPYING --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlsxXIcACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPr5kQgAmFYgehcKWp1WW+dIkv7cFaNr3wIJrPFFSXm8tNVZ2SghYIpKF8Z+SU4b /Jen9X7XP8w89jXV3tDLQeWLkrHMBRBcGsYy7HkXxxiwQZ6tV2XQdO6FyzLny0T5 PL8wHY5BSX0WEvl0rOPxIr6wRWbQRRz2PIvSRTrYU80O/mB1eqVQs/DcIecsVOGv 5JKGNKDlxw0NkHytxRVSLJWI26MPgIIlSab/lIJGODHfrQ7CLEpuCTfIDkq93w+C 4z2h13f7Nngoq8IOt/dyZ0FWfMu6OihACqz9Z3zzGs7+CkyfKgLuHYk0uzCPsQib 64gJ33wX1hmvUFb2ZW0h+kuibLseog== =dOIt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--