From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50404)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fcoTF-00033H-Sx
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 04:58:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fcoTC-0003vj-MB
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 04:58:05 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45137)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1fcoTC-0003vU-Id
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 04:58:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fcoTC-0003cH-5a
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 04:58:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#32102] [PATCH] utils: Fix wrap-program filename generation.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.32102.B32102.153121306913881@debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <20180709013103.26091-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
	<87k1q4j1zk.fsf@lassieur.org> <cu7efgcn0pg.fsf@systemreboot.net>
	<87r2kc8pm8.fsf@lassieur.org> <cu7bmbfn00f.fsf@systemreboot.net>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur <clement@lassieur.org>
In-reply-to: <cu7bmbfn00f.fsf@systemreboot.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 10:57:44 +0200
Message-ID: <87h8l7ii2f.fsf@lassieur.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
Cc: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>, 32102@debbugs.gnu.org

Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net> writes:

>> should WRAP (from python-build-system.scm) wrap files that already
>> have a wrapper?  I think it shouldn't.
>
> I agree with your analysis. How about I send a patch modifying WRAP
> (from python-build-system) to only wrap non-hidden files (files whose
> name do not begin with a dot) in bin and sbin?

That sounds good, but I'm not a Python expert, and I don't know if there
are cases where hidden files would need to be wrapped.  I'm CCing
Andreas and Mark because they know better than me.