From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37538) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hpft5-0001bt-FW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:30:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hpfst-0005jB-H8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:30:17 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53121) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hpfsg-0005a4-OX for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:30:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hpfsg-0003qV-De for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:30:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#36513] texlive-union: Build missing font maps. Resent-Message-ID: References: <87d0ioschd.fsf@elephly.net> <87muhfghu4.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhlfgh4g.fsf@elephly.net> <87tvbib587.fsf@gnu.org> <87imrtdg3j.fsf@elephly.net> <87zhl5stz8.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: <87zhl5stz8.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 23:27:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87h87ddajv.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: 36513@debbugs.gnu.org Pierre Neidhardt writes: > Thanks for making progress on this! :) > > Out of curiosity, why bother renaming the branches and not simply choose > a different name, e.g. wip-texlive-union? Is there something special with > the "wip-texlive" name? No. It=E2=80=99s just the name I picked. At first I thought I could include the importer but then noticed that it isn=E2=80=99t close enough to finished, so I moved it out again. Had I kno= wn this earlier I would have picked a different branch for my work in the first place. --=20 Ricardo