From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58495) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iRteB-0001f8-9A for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 02:53:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iRteA-0001x3-45 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 02:53:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57257) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iRteA-0001wz-0r for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 02:53:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iRte9-0007k1-St for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 02:53:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#38060] [PATCH] gnu: CMake: Update to 3.15.5. Resent-Message-ID: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58443) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iRtdq-0001ZG-Ft for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 02:52:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iRtdp-0001ki-H1 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 02:52:42 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x442.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::442]:41066) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iRtdp-0001kA-8u for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 02:52:41 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x442.google.com with SMTP id p4so20075517wrm.8 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 23:52:40 -0800 (PST) References: <20191104165746.GJ17621@sax.terramar.selidor.net> From: Mathieu Othacehe In-reply-to: <20191104165746.GJ17621@sax.terramar.selidor.net> Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 08:52:36 +0100 Message-ID: <87h83irc8r.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 38060@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: mbakke@fastmail.com Hello! > I've been trying the package built from this patch for some days and it seems > to work ok and indeed fix the issues that were affecting us. Your patch seems fine. However, I think it will cause a rebuild of all cmake based packages (even though they are not listed by guix refresh -l). So I think we need to wait for the next staging cycle. Marius, is that correct? Mathieu