From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id wDoUDzNJ1V4aRAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 18:30:11 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 6Pe/CjNJ1V7pMAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 18:30:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 763129404C8 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 18:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46812 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfpCL-000463-Cf for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 14:30:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40710) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfpCE-00045F-Dm for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 14:30:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53685) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfpCE-0005Hc-3P for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 14:30:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jfpCE-00046k-0C for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 14:30:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#40236] [PATCH] doc: Suggest Btrfs with compression instead of ext4 for root partition. Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 18:30:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40236 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: 40236@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Efraim Flashner , Jonathan Brielmaier Received: via spool by 40236-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40236.159103618415738 (code B ref 40236); Mon, 01 Jun 2020 18:30:01 +0000 Received: (at 40236) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jun 2020 18:29:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36998 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jfpBv-00045m-MN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 14:29:43 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f193.google.com ([209.85.160.193]:34954) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jfpBt-00045Z-V2 for 40236@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 14:29:42 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f193.google.com with SMTP id z1so8540967qtn.2 for <40236@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 11:29:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=aBMkcB3frrCV3uKRrnU28ZPgznYcYvwJkw8AeQQaJeI=; b=TYGsD6lpMwu2wC1KJGS/zgN0J3iimXeba8mxrQSTdU/jPTIz5BZafjIVGeRnioIiLK w04KjLHiilpIYzgSd9Qy3ayEe/NUFWraNVVJcFwWBjxuFQ2Bc/X63uaWbWLz9M92QhNS /5/HNg2pL2caGgfVh6Ssam4U8Lr+isspPbV15F3nDDD+5MT/wPPD6Un3Ug0XbE/Q1WEn JxF7rgtbM/BL3l9tn3VagVcvHTmYIdEmjL5c/MeCW7gdpeHuEHLTCYul498/dx+jBoOU 4v4bqBePzTdyFvd6CYmJ5j4p2bScYSwPJ9Z4Yd3qblUE74Jocesu2m2NhvQP/1JNfDdo C5iQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=aBMkcB3frrCV3uKRrnU28ZPgznYcYvwJkw8AeQQaJeI=; b=HxRr4eDnJAUmkLZhnBK3UG6xl1LYdumt5/OtgFhapuX/Ump3vh9xP42Cc3y1ScyzkM GVa6pJ7EQ4bUgH9yOsu3OeSxt4h4LG/5MepuFmgAtc66FlVOIfBZp8Fg+FRI9FiN71+U e19TJgDLUl2gq2mQSHbwCxSKKGGk6PB8JEgV1GDjwQrl0gOqGVczO+ei/eJvIeO2KRS1 ihFsCkDD4ZSPOc7AEAG/DNF0uKVB9sXrVY1ip2xayJUz0CXlRprcYtyh1jqTjCTpi550 OGlS+zA5VGQd5B+9r7SlEHtM44uafegY8ooWQW7Epc2ufoGzMyFHGkXJUjdPeZp6CMlR rygQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531XGySJh3BW6qJVaeGLyS6KJXND2fJlnXCpbjIrqJpHc0R8VgNN 2eozc86ldxuC5YuYJiZ6oeE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzEgLikK01OpnRGWu16t+v1yIF1CXk1ExSr5kIwKe4ALg1MSmNp3HrZsnEFea9gcDv6y7qMYg== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:306d:: with SMTP id g42mr22724808qte.18.1591036176492; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 11:29:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-148-140.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.148.140]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x4sm113841qtj.43.2020.06.01.11.29.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 01 Jun 2020 11:29:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <87o8s2k6lr.fsf@gmail.com> <20200409201244.GR1518@E5400> <87o8rzvlg9.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20200410082425.GA1518@E5400> <87eesvvhim.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87h7xmiz96.fsf@gmail.com> <87lfmya78b.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87y2p83650.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20200531075532.GD7397@E5400> <878sh75scf.fsf@gmail.com> <20200601061603.GF7397@E5400> <87ftbfcjkn.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 14:29:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ftbfcjkn.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> (Pierre Neidhardt's message of "Mon, 01 Jun 2020 09:48:56 +0200") Message-ID: <87h7vuod0x.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=TYGsD6lp; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: BLA2Dy0qKrKO Hi! Pierre Neidhardt writes: > Efraim Flashner writes: > >> I always understood that as with compression you're using 51G instead of >> 88G, and because of deduplication from the daemon it would only be 88G >> instead of 217G. I took the numbers from 'none' to mean that the daemon >> itself already did a lot of deduplication. > > That's what I understood as well. tl;dr Your understanding is correct. I was under the impression that hard links shouldn't inflate the numbers reported under the "Referenced" column. I just asked over #btrfs and while hard links shouldn't inflate those numbers (as hard links aren't reflinks), they currently do. It's a bug. Maxim