From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id eE1MAvKyK18tdAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 07:36:18 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id yBjMOfGyK1+iawAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 07:36:17 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF358940365 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 07:36:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48108 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3aRh-00062v-5I for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 03:36:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55874) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3aRW-00062I-5R for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 03:36:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41483) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3aRV-0002Bm-S2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 03:36:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3aRV-0005rt-O0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 03:36:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#42686] Update to linux-libre 5.7 Resent-From: Mathieu Othacehe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 07:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42686 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 42686@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: leo@famulari.name Received: via spool by 42686-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42686.159669931822497 (code B ref 42686); Thu, 06 Aug 2020 07:36:01 +0000 Received: (at 42686) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2020 07:35:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53029 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3aQo-0005qm-DS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 03:35:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45462) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3aQm-0005qY-C6 for 42686@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 03:35:16 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47129) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3aQg-0001vW-TA; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 03:35:10 -0400 Received: from lfbn-ann-1-356-169.w86-200.abo.wanadoo.fr ([86.200.73.169]:44330 helo=meru) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1k3aQe-0006mF-Jq; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 03:35:10 -0400 From: Mathieu Othacehe References: <20200802224356.GA4714@jasmine.lan> <20200805172716.GA8526@jasmine.lan> Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:35:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20200805172716.GA8526@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of "Wed, 5 Aug 2020 13:27:16 -0400") Message-ID: <87h7tgut06.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: eh6FZEMhoaWh Hey, > I guess that it doesn't build kernels for armhf, since it appears that > nothing was attempted. They should be built too, the "omap2plus" arm variant has been built successfully, see: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3083232/details. Anyway, looking good, thanks for the update :) Mathieu