[bug#49329] [PATCH 00/??] Improve Ren'py package

[Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1531 bytes --]

Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> writes:

>> From my understanding, the “implemented” plan is described by Maxim
>> here:
>> 
>>    <https://yhetil.org/guix/87pn1oxv0m.fsf@gmail.com/>
> Using this plan as a starting point, I think renpy counts as a non-
> variant package relying on some python2-variant.
>
>> I just want to point that it is less work to transfer a functional
>> and
>> supported by upstream package than to transfer a package starting to
>> have issues.  Other said, I think it is easier to find motivation to
>> do
>> the transfer for this previous case than to do some “janitor” work
>> later.  For what my opinion is worth. :-)
> Fair enough, I could open up a merge request to have renpy in Guix Past
> "ahead of time", but OTOH I feel like `guix time-machine` offers
> similar benefits.  If we're going to *mirror* python packages, because
> they will soon be broken, I think it would also be a good idea to start
> from python2 instead of leaf packages.

I feel like keeping it all in Guix proper but vaguely "moving things
toward Python 3 wherever possible" is the best approach for now.  An
approach like the one Maxim suggested in the above link sounds good.

Moving Ren'Py to Guix-Past would be fine, I guess, but I have to admit
it feels a little strange.  After all, Ren'Py is neither stale nor
unmaintained.  However, some of its dependencies are (like Python 2),
and their plan for upgrading to Python 3 sounds like it will take years.

-- 
Chris

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 861 bytes --]