[bug#69778] [PATCH gnome-team] gnu: telegram: Build with glibmm@2.76.

[Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>]

Hi,

Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes:

> Am Mittwoch, dem 13.03.2024 um 17:45 +0100 schrieb Vivien Kraus:
>> * gnu/packages/telegram.scm (glibmm-for-telegram-desktop): New
>> variable.
>> (telegram-desktop): Use glibmm-for-telegram-desktop instead of
>> glibmm.
>> 
>> Change-Id: I0ec4ebc549dd867db22d68ee6317d1630cf1bfd8
>> ---
>> 
>> Dear Guix,
>> 
>> While we are waiting for the telegram-desktop update in #67493, here
>> is a minimally intrusive way to keep it working on gnome-team, by
>> using an older version of glibmm.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Vivien
>> 
>>  gnu/packages/telegram.scm | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/telegram.scm b/gnu/packages/telegram.scm
>> index 7d02824efa..16d36b2c7c 100644
>> --- a/gnu/packages/telegram.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/telegram.scm
>> @@ -74,7 +74,9 @@ (define-module (gnu packages telegram)
>>    #:use-module ((guix licenses) #:prefix license:)
>>    #:use-module (guix packages)
>>    #:use-module (guix gexp)
>> +  #:use-module (guix download)
>>    #:use-module (guix git-download)
>> +  #:use-module (guix utils)
>>    #:use-module (guix build-system cmake)
>>    #:use-module (guix build-system copy)
>>    #:use-module (guix build-system glib-or-gtk)
>> @@ -267,6 +269,21 @@ (define tgcalls-for-telegram-desktop
>>       (base32
>>        "193m2gkvipijqbfd6a8mhg9nd63wlnshzgspk3pip57vk21l709z"))))
>>  
>> +(define-public glibmm-for-telegram-desktop
>> +  (hidden-package
>> +   (package
>> +     (inherit glibmm)
>> +     (name "glibmm-for-telegram-desktop")
>> +     (version "2.76.0")
>> +     (source (origin
>> +               (method url-fetch)
>> +               (uri (string-append "mirror://gnome/sources/glibmm/"
>> +                                   (version-major+minor version)
>> +                                   "/glibmm-" version ".tar.xz"))
>> +               (sha256
>> +                (base32
>> +                
>> "1cia8vrpwzn8zwalws42mga5hi965840m5s8dvfzv55xx86dhdw6")))))))
>> +
> Canonically, inherited packages are put in the same files as the
> package they inherit.

Yes.  That's important to avoid the dreaded circular module import
problem (info "(guix) Cyclic Module Dependencies").

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim