From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37916) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxunE-0002TO-8r for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 08:21:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxun8-00014j-Kw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 08:21:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43834) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxun8-00014d-H3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 08:21:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cxun8-0004Gq-CR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 08:21:02 -0400 Subject: bug#26341: [PATCH 1/5] build: syscalls: Add reboot. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20170402150157.7149-1-m.othacehe@gmail.com> <20170410171814.18461-1-m.othacehe@gmail.com> <87tw5vtidz.fsf@gnu.org> <86vaqbqil1.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 14:20:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <86vaqbqil1.fsf@gmail.com> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Tue, 11 Apr 2017 13:39:22 +0200") Message-ID: <87fuhft9tn.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Mathieu Othacehe Cc: 26341-done@debbugs.gnu.org Heya, Mathieu Othacehe skribis: > While we are talking of build warnings, the only remaining warnings are > related to cairo : > > ... > gnu/build/svg.scm:36:12: warning: possibly unbound variable `cairo-create' > gnu/build/svg.scm:36:26: warning: possibly unbound variable `cairo-image-= surface-create' > gnu/build/svg.scm:38:4: warning: possibly unbound variable `cairo-scale' > gnu/build/svg.scm:39:4: warning: possibly unbound variable `cairo-set-sou= rce-surface' > ... > > This file mentions closed bug http://bugs.gnu.org/12202. Is there > something that can be done ? Good question! In fact it doesn=E2=80=99t make much sense to have =E2=80= =98make=E2=80=99 compile this file since it=E2=80=99s only used on the =E2=80=9Cbuild side= =E2=80=9D, from (gnu system grub). So perhaps we should simply adjust Makefile.am & co. to not build this file. Thoughts? (I think there=E2=80=99s a couple of other files in a similar situation.) Ludo=E2=80=99.