From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53306) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8U5t-0001Mg-Vc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 12:04:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8U5q-0007aE-JW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 12:04:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34239) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8U5q-0007aA-Gu for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 12:04:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d8U5q-0005Ep-9Z for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 12:04:02 -0400 Subject: bug#26803: [PATCH 20/36] gnu: Add java-commons-daemon. Resent-Message-ID: References: <20170506153617.3074-1-rekado@elephly.net> <20170506153617.3074-20-rekado@elephly.net> From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 18:03:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87fugchf7t.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Roel Janssen Cc: Hartmut Goebel , 26803@debbugs.gnu.org Roel Janssen writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> From: Hartmut Goebel >> >> * gnu/packages/java.scm (java-commons-daemon): New variable. >> >> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Wurmus >> --- >> gnu/packages/java.scm | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/gnu/packages/java.scm b/gnu/packages/java.scm >> index e4913973d..af6b0761f 100644 >> --- a/gnu/packages/java.scm >> +++ b/gnu/packages/java.scm >> @@ -1867,3 +1867,37 @@ phonetic encoding utilities. >> >> This is a part of the Apache Commons Project.") >> (license license:asl2.0))) >> + >> +(define-public java-commons-daemon >> + (package >> + (name "java-commons-daemon") >> + (version "1.0.15") >> + (source (origin >> + (method url-fetch) >> + (uri (string-append "mirror://apache/commons/daemon/source/" >> + "commons-daemon-" version "-src.tar.gz")) >> + (sha256 >> + (base32 >> + "0ci46kq8jpz084ccwq0mmkahcgsmh20ziclp2jf5i0djqv95gvhi")))) >> + (build-system ant-build-system) >> + (arguments >> + `(#:test-target "test" >> + #:phases >> + (modify-phases %standard-phases >> + (add-after 'build 'build-javadoc ant-build-javadoc) >> + (replace 'install (install-jars "dist")) >> + (add-after 'install 'install-doc (install-javadoc "dist/docs/api"))))) >> + (native-inputs >> + `(("java-junit" ,java-junit))) >> + (home-page "http://commons.apache.org/daemon/") >> + (synopsis "Library to launch Java applications as daemons") >> + (description "The Daemon package from Apache Commons can be used to > > I'm not sure about the usage of the @code{}, but maybe @code{Daemon} or > 'Daemon'? I think it’s fine the way it is. The project name is Daemon; the jar/class name is different, so @code{} would not be appropriate. >> +implement Java applications which can be launched as daemons. For example the >> +program will be notified about a shutdown so that it can perform cleanup tasks >> +before its process of execution is destroyed by the operation system. >> + >> +This package contains the java library. You will also need the actual binary > > maybe Java instead? Yes, you’re right. >> +for your architecture which is provided by the jsvc package. > > maybe @code{jsvc}? If we had @package{} I would have used it here, but @code{} wouldn’t be right either. (We also don’t have a jsvc package yet, so … not sure.) -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net