From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56194) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8VsD-00050p-Dm for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 13:58:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8VsA-0007aD-Bz for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 13:58:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34357) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8VsA-0007Zr-87 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 13:58:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d8VsA-0001bB-2K for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 13:58:02 -0400 Subject: bug#26868: [PATCH] gnu: python-pytest-runner: Update to 2.11.1. Resent-Message-ID: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56114) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8Vru-0004w7-7T for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 13:57:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8Vrq-0007JL-C4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 13:57:46 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:35276) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8Vrq-0007J6-8P for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 13:57:42 -0400 Received: from ip112-245-209-87.adsl2.static.versatel.nl ([87.209.245.112]:50907 helo=antelope) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1d8Vrp-0003TW-Lq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 13:57:42 -0400 From: Roel Janssen Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 19:57:37 +0200 Message-ID: <87fugcbnn2.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 26868@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=0001-gnu-python-pytest-runner-Update-to-2.11.1.patch >From 33ba51e99c62243905cb88466eb5bfea557aaf4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Roel Janssen Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 19:53:45 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: python-pytest-runner: Update to 2.11.1. * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-pytest-runner): Update to 2.11.1. --- gnu/packages/python.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm index 60d3868e9..be0202de6 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/python.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/python.scm @@ -1879,14 +1879,14 @@ supports coverage of subprocesses.") (define-public python-pytest-runner (package (name "python-pytest-runner") - (version "2.6.2") + (version "2.11.1") (source (origin (method url-fetch) (uri (pypi-uri "pytest-runner" version)) (sha256 (base32 - "1nwcqx0l3fv52kv8526wy8ypzghbq96c96di318d98d3wh7a8xg7")))) + "1cw978kqqcq916b9gfns1qjqvg33c5ail5jhw9054dsynkm32flq")))) (build-system python-build-system) (arguments `(#:phases -- 2.12.2 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Dear Guix, When attempting to add another package (python-maildir-deduplicate), I needed to upgrade this one. Since I'm not sure about the impact of this update, I'd like to have an opinion on whether this can go in as-is, or that more care should be taken. Kind regards, Roel Janssen --=-=-=--